首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Effects of depth on reef fish communities: Insights of a “deep refuge hypothesis” from Southwestern Atlantic reefs
【2h】

Effects of depth on reef fish communities: Insights of a “deep refuge hypothesis” from Southwestern Atlantic reefs

机译:深度对珊瑚礁鱼类群落的影响:来自西南大西洋珊瑚礁的“深度避难所假说”的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Deeper reefs are often considered to be less susceptible to local and global disturbances, such as overfishing, pollution and climate change, compared to shallow reefs and therefore could act as refugia for shallow water species. Hence, the interest on deeper reefs has happened at a time when shallow reefs are undergoing unprecedented changes. Here we investigated the hypothesis that fish community differed from shallow to deeper reefs due to factors apart from habitat structure and quality and therefore discuss for the first-time insights of a “deep refuge hypothesis” from Brazilian reefs. We collected data on fish community, benthic community and physiological conditions of two coral species on shallow (< 6 m) and deep reefs (> 25 m). No significant difference on substratum composition was observed comparing sites and depths. Additionally, physiological data on corals also showed similar oxidative status and growth conditions when comparing the two-coral species in shallow and deep reefs. Conversely, our study demonstrated strong differences on reef fish communities in terms of abundance, species richness, trophic groups, size classes and groups of interest when comparing shallow and deeper reefs. Fish abundance was 2-fold higher and species richness was up to 70% higher on deeper reefs. Also, a significant difference was observed comparing trophic groups of reef fish. Macrocarnivore, Mobile invertebrate feeders, Planktivores, Sessile Invertebrates Feeders and Roving Herbivores were more abundant on deeper reefs. On the other hand, Territorialist Herbivores almost exclusively dominated shallow reefs. Strong differences were also observed comparing the abundance of reef fish groups of interest and their respective size classes between shallow and deeper reefs. Ornamental, Great Herbivores and Groupers showed clear differences, with higher abundances being observed in deeper reefs. Considering size classes, larger individuals (> 15 cm) of Great Herbivores, Groupers and Snapper were uniquely recorded at deeper reefs. Additionally, individuals with > 30 cm were recorded almost exclusively on deeper reefs for all the analyzed groups of interest. Our findings suggest that fishing pressure on the target species may be attenuated on deeper reefs, and these regions may therefore be considered as areas of refuge from shallow water impacts. Therefore, the likely potential for deeper reefs protect species from natural or anthropogenic disturbances increases the attention of marine conservation planning and resource management on including deeper reefs in protected areas.
机译:与浅礁相比,深礁通常被认为不易受到本地和全球性干扰,例如过度捕捞,污染和气候变化,因此可以充当浅水物种的避难所。因此,对浅礁的兴趣正发生在浅礁正在发生前所未有的变化的时候。在这里,我们调查了由于栖息地结构和质量以外的因素,鱼类群落从浅礁到深礁的差异的假说,因此,我们首次讨论了来自巴西礁的“深避难所假说”。我们收集了浅海(<6 m)和深海礁(> 25 m)上两种珊瑚物种的鱼类群落,底栖生物群落和生理状况的数据。比较位置和深度,未观察到基质组成的显着差异。此外,当比较浅礁和深礁中的两种珊瑚时,有关珊瑚的生理数据也显示出相似的氧化状态和生长条件。相反,我们的研究表明,在比较浅层和深层珊瑚礁时,珊瑚礁鱼类群落在丰度,物种丰富度,营养种类,大小类别和关注群体方面存在很大差异。在更深的珊瑚礁上,鱼类的丰度提高了2倍,物种丰富度提高了70%。另外,比较营养鱼类组的珊瑚鱼,观察到显着差异。大型食肉动物,流动无脊椎动物饲养动物,浮游动物,无脊椎动物无脊椎动物饲养动物和粗草食草动物在较深的珊瑚礁上更为丰富。另一方面,地域食草动物几乎只占浅礁的主导地位。比较浅礁和深礁之间感兴趣的礁鱼种类的丰富程度及其各自的大小等级,也观察到强烈差异。观赏性,大型食草动物和石斑鱼显示出明显的差异,在更深的珊瑚礁中观察到更高的丰度。考虑到大小分类,在较深的珊瑚礁上唯一记录了较大的食草动物(> 15厘米),石斑鱼和鲷鱼。此外,对于所有感兴趣的分析组,几乎仅在深礁上记录了> 30 cm的个体。我们的发现表明,在更深的珊瑚礁上,对目标物种的捕捞压力可能会减弱,因此,这些区域可能被视为浅水影响的避难所。因此,更深的礁石可能保护物种免受自然或人为干扰的可能性增加了海洋保护规划和资源管理对将更深的礁石纳入保护区的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号