首页> 外文期刊>Ecosphere >Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
【24h】

Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements

机译:电力线,道路和河流的差异性障碍和走廊效应对驼鹿( Alces alces )运动的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Building new power lines is required to satisfy increasing demands for the transmission of electricity, and at the same time the road network is expanding. To provide guidelines for the routing of new power lines and roads, it is essential to test whether linear features deter or attract movements of animals in different landscape settings. Using GPS relocation data from 151 moose ( Alces alces L.) in central Norway, we tested for barrier and corridor effects of roads, power lines and rivers and accounted for forest cover, the topographical orientation of linear features and the placement of other nearby linear features. We predicted step selection probabilities for different movement options at varying distances from linear features and linear feature combinations. Barrier and corridor effects of linear features altered moose movements, although effects were minor compared to the effects of topography and forest cover. Moose did not avoid crossing power lines, unless the placement of power lines along contour lines impeded movements across them. In contrast, moose avoided crossing of roads and rivers in forests. Moose more likely moved along linear features when getting closer to linear features. Barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/river combinations compared to single linear features. Likewise, the barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/power line combinations, but not power line/river combinations compared to single linear features, when moose were close to the edge of those features. The inconsistent pattern could be due to the low sample size. We found indications of higher disturbance potential of roads compared to power lines and rivers. Managing vegetation in power line rights‐of‐way to provide abundant browse could counteract possible disturbance, while wildlife overpasses could mitigate road fragmentation effects.
机译:需要建造新的电力线以满足不断增长的电力传输需求,与此同时,道路网络也在扩大。为了为新的电力线和道路的布线提供指导,必须测试线性特征是否会阻止或吸引不同景观环境中的动物运动。使用来自挪威中部151个驼鹿(Alces alces L.)的GPS定位数据,我们测试了道路,电力线和河流的障碍和走廊效应,并说明了森林覆盖率,线性要素的地形方向以及其他附近线性要素的位置特征。我们预测了在距线性特征和线性特征组合的距离不同的情况下,不同运动选项的步选择概率。尽管与地形和森林覆盖的影响相比,线性特征的障碍和走廊效应改变了驼鹿的运动,但影响较小。驼鹿没有避免交叉电源线,除非沿着轮廓线放置电源线会阻止电源线的移动。相反,麋避免了森林中道路和河流的穿越。当接近线性要素时,驼鹿更有可能沿着线性要素移动。与单个线性要素相比,道路/河流组合的障碍和走廊效应更高。同样,当驼鹿靠近那些要素的边缘时,与单个线性要素相比,道路/电力线组合的障碍和走廊效应更高,而电力线/河道组合则没有。模式不一致可能是由于样本量小。我们发现,与电力线和河流相比,道路潜在干扰的可能性更高。在电力线通行权中管理植被以提供充足的浏览可以抵消可能的干扰,而野生生物立交桥则可以减轻道路支离破碎的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号