【24h】

Sharing as risk pooling in a social dilemma experiment

机译:在社会困境实验中分担风险共担

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In rural economies with missing or incomplete markets, idiosyncratic risk is frequently pooled through informal networks. Idiosyncratic shocks, however, are not limited to private goods but can also restrict an individual from partaking in or benefiting from a collective activity. In these situations, a group must decide whether to provide insurance to the affected member. We describe results of a laboratory experiment designed to test whether a simple sharing institution can sustain risk pooling in a social dilemma with idiosyncratic risk. We tested whether risk could be pooled without a commitment device and, separately, whether effective risk pooling induced greater cooperation in the social dilemma. We found that even in the absence of a commitment device or reputational considerations, subjects voluntarily pooled risk, thereby reducing variance in individual earnings. In spite of effective risk pooling, however, cooperation in the social dilemma was unaffected.
机译:在缺少市场或市场不完整的农村经济中,特有的风险通常通过非正式的网络来汇总。但是,特质冲击不仅限于私人物品,还可能限制个人参与集体活动或从中受益。在这种情况下,小组必须决定是否向受影响的成员提供保险。我们描述了旨在测试简单的共享机构是否可以在具有特质风险的社会困境中维持风险汇总的实验室实验的结果。我们测试了在没有承诺机制的情况下是否可以汇总风险,以及有效的风险汇总是否在社会困境中引发了更大的合作。我们发现,即使没有承诺工具或声誉考虑因素,受试者也可以自愿分担风险,从而减少个人收入的差异。尽管有效地进行了风险分担,但在社会困境中的合作并未受到影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号