...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors
【24h】

Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors

机译:在多个压力源之间重新构想协同作用和拮抗作用

获取原文

摘要

AbstractThe potential for complex synergistic or antagonistic interactions between multiple stressors presents one of the largest uncertainties when predicting ecological change but, despite common use of the terms in the scientific literature, a consensus on their operational definition is still lacking. The identification of synergism or antagonism is generally straightforward when stressors operate in the same direction, but if individual stressor effects oppose each other, the definition of synergism is paradoxical because what is synergistic to one stressor's effect direction is antagonistic to the others. In their highly cited meta-analysis, Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) assumed in situations with opposing individual effects that synergy only occurs when the cumulative effect is more negative than the additive sum of the opposing individual effects. We argue against this and propose a new systematic classification based on an additive effects model that combines the magnitude and response direction of the cumulative effect and the interaction effect. A new class of “mitigating synergism” is identified, where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced. We applied our directional classification to the dataset compiled by Crain et al. (Ecology Letters, 11, 2008: 1304) to determine the prevalence of synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions. Compared to their original analysis, we report differences in the representation of interaction classes by interaction type and we document examples of mitigating synergism, highlighting the importance of incorporating individual stressor effect directions in the determination of synergisms and antagonisms. This is particularly pertinent given a general bias in ecology toward investigating and reporting adverse multiple stressor effects (double negative). We emphasize the need for reconsideration by the ecological community of the interpretation of synergism and antagonism in situations where individual stressor effects oppose each other or where cumulative effects are reversed and enhanced.
机译:摘要在预测生态变化时,多种应激源之间复杂的协同或拮抗相互作用的潜力是最大的不确定因素之一,但是,尽管科学文献中经常使用这些术语,但仍缺乏对其操作定义的共识。当压力源在相同方向上起作用时,协同作用或拮抗作用的识别通常很简单,但是如果单个压力源作用彼此相对,则协同作用的定义是自相矛盾的,因为与一个压力源作用方向协同作用的是相反的。在他们被高度引用的荟萃分析中,Crain等人。 (Ecology Letters,11:2008:1304)在具有相反个体效应的情况下假设,只有当累积效应比相反个体效应的累加总和更负时,才发生协同作用。我们对此表示反对,并提出了一种基于加性效应模型的新的系统分类方法,该模型将累积效应和相互作用效应的大小和响应方向相结合。确定了新类别的“缓解协同作用”,在此类别中,累积效应被逆转并增强。我们将方向分类应用于由Crain等人编译的数据集。 (Ecology Letters,2008年11月:1304)来确定协同,拮抗和加性相互作用的发生率。与他们的原始分析相比,我们报告了按交互作用类型表示的交互作用类别的差异,并记录了减轻协同作用的示例,强调了在确定协同作用和拮抗作用时纳入单个应激源作用方向的重要性。鉴于生态学普遍偏向于调查和报告不利的多重应激效应(双负),这一点特别相关。我们强调,生态社区需要重新考虑个别压力源效应相互对立或累积效应被逆转和增强的情况下的协同作用和拮抗作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号