首页> 外文期刊>EBioMedicine >Telephone Consultation as a Substitute for Routine Out-patient Face-to-face Consultation for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Randomised Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation
【24h】

Telephone Consultation as a Substitute for Routine Out-patient Face-to-face Consultation for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Randomised Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation

机译:电话咨询可替代炎症性肠病患儿的常规门诊面对面咨询:随机对照试验和经济评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Evidence for the use of telephone consultation in childhood inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is lacking. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost consequences of telephone consultation compared with the usual out-patient face-to-face consultation for young people with IBD. Methods: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in Manchester, UK, between July 12, 2010 and June 30, 2013. Young people (aged 8-16years) with IBD were randomized to receive telephone consultation or face-to-face consultation for 24months. The primary outcome measure was the paediatric IBD-specific IMPACT quality of life (QOL) score at 12months. Secondary outcome measures included patient satisfaction with consultations, disease course, anthropometric measures, proportion of consultations attended, duration of consultations, and costs to the UK National Health Service (NHS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02319798. Findings: Eighty six patients were randomised to receive either telephone consultation (n=44) or face-to-face consultation (n=42). Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. At 12months, there was no evidence of difference in QOL scores (estimated treatment effect in favour of the telephone consultation group was 5.7 points, 95% CI -2.9 to 14.3; p=0.19). Mean consultation times were 9.8min (IQR 8 to 12.3) for telephone consultation, and 14.3min (11.6 to 17.0) for face-to-face consultation with an estimated reduction (95% CI) of 4.3 (2.8 to 5.7) min in consultation times (p<0.001). Telephone consultation had a mean cost of UK@$35.41 per patient consultation compared with @$51.12 for face-face consultation, difference @$15.71 (95% CI 11.8-19.6; P<0.001). Interpretation: We found no suggestion of inferiority of telephone consultation compared with face-to-face consultation with regard to improvements in QOL scores, and telephone consultation reduced consultation time and NHS costs. Telephone consultation is a cost-effective alternative to face-to-face consultation for the routine outpatient follow-up of children and adolescents with IBD. Funding: Research for Patient Benefit Programme, UK National Institute for Health Research.
机译:背景:缺乏在儿童炎症性肠病(IBD)中使用电话咨询的证据。我们旨在评估与IBD年轻人一般的门诊面对面咨询相比,电话咨询的有效性和成本后果。方法:我们于2010年7月12日至2013年6月30日在英国曼彻斯特进行了一项随机对照试验。将患有IBD的年轻人(8-16岁)随机接受24个月的电话咨询或面对面咨询。主要结局指标是12个月时小儿IBD特异性IMPACT生活质量(QOL)评分。次要结局指标包括患者对会诊的满意度,疾病过程,人体测量学,会诊比例,会诊持续时间以及英国国家卫生服务(NHS)的费用。分析是按意向进行的。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT02319798。结果:86名患者被随机分配接受电话咨询(n = 44)或面对面咨询(n = 42)。两组的基线特征很好地平衡。在12个月时,没有QOL评分差异的证据(电话咨询小组的估计治疗效果为5.7分,95%CI -2.9至14.3; p = 0.19)。电话咨询的平均咨询时间为9.8分钟(IQR 8至12.3),面对面咨询的平均咨询时间为14.3分钟(11.6至17.0),估计咨询的减少时间(95%CI)为4.3(2.8至5.7)分钟时间(p <0.001)。电话咨询的平均费用为UK@35.41美元/患者咨询,而面对面的咨询为51.12美元,差异为15.71美元(95%CI 11.8-19.6; P <0.001)。解释:在提高QOL分数方面,我们发现电话咨询的效果不如面对面咨询,而且电话咨询减少了咨询时间和NHS成本。对于IBD儿童和青少年的常规门诊随访,电话咨询是面对面咨询的一种经济有效的选择。资金:英国国立卫生研究院患者受益计划研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号