...
首页> 外文期刊>Eastern Journal of Medicine >Contribution of Sonoelastography in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A Comparative Analysis on Sonographic BIRADS Classification
【24h】

Contribution of Sonoelastography in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A Comparative Analysis on Sonographic BIRADS Classification

机译:超声弹性成像在乳腺良性和恶性肿块鉴别中的贡献:超声BIRADS分类的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Contribution of Sonoelastography in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A Comparative Analysis on Sonographic BIRADS Classification Harun Arslan 1, Zülküf Akdemir2, Alpaslan Yavuz1, Necat ?slamoglu2, Sebahhatin ?elik3, Mesut ?zg?k?e1, Abdussamet Batur1, Hüseyin Akdeniz1, Harun Egemen Tolunay4 1Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Dursun Odaba?? Medical Center, Department Of Radiology Van/ Turkey 2Van Training And Research Hospital, Department Of Radiology Van/ Turkey 3Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Dursun Odaba?? Medical Center, Department Of General Surgery, Van/ Turkey 4Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School Of Medicine, Department Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology. Van/ Turkey INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectivity of ultrasonographic elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions detected on B-mode ultrasonography. METHODS: The lesions were scored by using B-mode USG with breast imaging-report and data systems (BIRADS) and then sonoelastographic color-coded maps were obtained by elastography in a single session. Sonoelastographic scoring was achieved with a 5-point scoring system. Elasticity scores and strain ratio (SR) values were compared with histopathological findings. RESULTS: The 133 patients included 132 (99.2%) women and 1 (0.8%) man. Mean age was 40.45±14.8 years.Depending on the pathological findings, 94 (71.2%) lesions were classified as benign and 39 (28.8%) as malignant. Mean SR value was 4.419±1.43, with 5.5 in malignant lesions and 4.3 in benign lesions. At the cut-off value of 4.95 for SR, the sensitivity and specificity of USG in elastographic examination were 81.6% and 78.7%, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the SR value and the BIRADS score calculated on USG (rho=0.86; two-tailed; p DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of sonoelastographic examination following the USG examination with B-mode ultrasonography can be a complementary diagnostic method that increases the specificity of USG
机译:超声弹性成像在良性和恶性乳腺肿块分化中的贡献:超声BIRADS分类的比较分析Harun Arslan 1 ,ZülküfAkdemir 2 ,Alpaslan Yavuz 1 ,Necat?slamoglu 2 ,Sebahhatin?elik 3 ,Mesut?zg?k?e 1 ,Abdussamet Batur 1 < / sup>,HüseyinAkdeniz 1 ,Harun Egemen Tolunay 4 1 范·尤尊库伊尔大学(Dursun Odaba)? Van土耳其放射科范医学中心 2 Van土耳其放射科范培训研究医院 3 Van Yuzuncu Yil University,Dursun Odaba?范/土耳其 4 范·尤尊库伊尔大学,医学院,妇产科和妇产科。 Van / Turkey简介:在本研究中,我们旨在研究超声弹性成像在B型超声检查中对良性和恶性病变的区分中的有效性。方法:使用B型USG与乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)对病变进行评分,然后在单次会话中通过弹性成像获得超声弹性成像彩色编码图。超声弹性图评分是通过5分评分系统实现的。将弹性评分和应变比(SR)值与组织病理学结果进行比较。结果:133名患者包括132名(99.2%)妇女和1名(0.8%)男子。平均年龄为40.45±14.8岁,根据病理结果,良性病变94例(71.2%),恶性39例(28.8%)。平均SR值为4.419±1.43,恶性病变为5.5,良性病变为4.3。在SR的截止值为4.95时,USG在弹性成像检查中的敏感性和特异性分别为81.6%和78.7%。发现SR值与在USG上计算的BIRADS评分之间存在显着相关性(rho = 0.86;两尾; p讨论和结论:总而言之,在USG结合B型超声检查后使用超声弹性成像检查可能是一种可行的方法。辅助诊断方法,可提高USG的特异性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号