首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Agronomy >Residual soil nitrate as affected by giant reed cultivation and cattle slurry fertilisation
【24h】

Residual soil nitrate as affected by giant reed cultivation and cattle slurry fertilisation

机译:巨型芦苇耕作和牛粪肥对土壤硝酸盐残留的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The residual soil nitrate (RSN) is the amount of nitrate which remains in soil profile after crop uptake has ceased, typically in the autumn. The RSN is prone to leaching and therefore poses serious environmental concerns, especially in areas with intensive livestock activities. Little is known about the ability of the energy grass giant reed in leaving low RSN. Such ability would add a desirable environmental benefit to giant reed cultivation. This article reports on snapshot measurements of RSN across soil profile in the autumn of three consecutive years: 2010, 2011 and 2012. Soil nitrate content was measured on soil samples collected from the soil layers 0-0.2 m, 0.2-0.4 m, 0.4-0.6 m and 0.6-0.8 m. The RSN of giant reed was compared with RSN of the energy crops sweet sorghum and poplar short rotation coppice (SRC). The three energy crops were treated with two fertilisation regimes: 0 kg N ha–1 (Control) and 20 mm of cattle slurry (CS20). Soil samples were also taken for a reference crop of winter wheat following winter wheat and receiving no N supply. Our findings for the three years of experiment can be summarised as follows: i) in case of the unfertilised Control, the three dedicated energy crops giant reed, sweet sorghum and poplar SRC left in soil profile in the autumn significantly lower amounts of RSN compared to the reference crop of wheat. Hence, all the three energy crops provided in similar manner the environmental benefit of leaving lower RSN; ii) in case of cattle slurry application the real advantage of giant reed cultivation became surprisingly evident. In fact, in three subsequent years the treatment giant reed CS20 never determined RSN significantly higher than RSN for giant reed Control. The RSN for giant reed with treatment CS20 was significantly lower than that the reference crop of wheat in all the three years. Unlike poplar SRC and sweet sorghum, giant reed exerted effective soil nitrate removal with a relatively high rate of cattle slurry application. Hence, this species can be regarded as suitable not only to utilise livestock effluents, but also to reduce the risk of nitrate pollution in many land use situations dealing with nitrogen surplus.
机译:残留的土壤硝酸盐(RSN)是在作物吸收停止后(通常在秋天)保留在土壤剖面中的硝酸盐含量。 RSN易于浸出,因此引起严重的环境问题,尤其是在牲畜活动频繁的地区。关于能量草巨re保留低RSN的能力知之甚少。这种能力将为巨型芦苇种植增加理想的环境效益。本文报告了连续三年秋季(2010年,2011年和2012年)在整个土壤剖面上的RSN的快照测量结果。在从0-0.2 m,0.2-0.4 m,0.4- 0.6 m和0.6-0.8 m将巨型芦苇的RSN与能源作物甜高粱和杨树短轮作(SRC)的RSN进行了比较。对三种能源作物进行了两种施肥处理:0 kg N ha-1(对照)和20 mm牛粪浆(CS20)。还采集了冬小麦参考作物后的土壤样品,但没有提供氮。我们在三年试验中的发现可以总结如下:i)在未施肥的对照下,秋季专用的三种专用能源作物巨型芦苇,甜高粱和杨树SRC留在土壤中,RSN的含量比小麦参考作物。因此,所有三种能源作物都以相似的方式提供了较低的RSN所带来的环境效益。 ii)在使用牛粪浆的情况下,巨型芦苇种植的真正优势变得出乎意料的明显。实际上,在随后的三年中,处理过的巨型芦苇CS20从未确定RSN明显高于巨型芦苇对照的RSN。在三年中,使用CS20处理的巨型芦苇的RSN均显着低于参考小麦。与杨树SRC和甜高粱不同,巨型芦苇可有效去除土壤中的硝酸盐,并且施用牛粪的比率相对较高。因此,该物种不仅可以用于畜禽粪便的利用,而且在许多处理氮素过剩的土地利用情况下,也可以降低硝酸盐污染的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号