首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of public health. >Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:局部前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术与警惕等待的长期临床结果:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The present study aimed to compare the long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy compared to the watchful waiting. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of relevant marker studies were scrutinized from inception to Jan 2018. Two reviewers conducted data ion and quality assessment of included trials independently. Quality of included studies were assessed by using Cochrane checklist. Inverse-variance and Mantel-Haenszel estimates under random effects model were used to pool results as relative risks with 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2. Results: Three randomized controlled trials with 1568 participants were included. Compared to watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy had no significant effect on all-cause mortality at 12-year follow-up. However, radical prostatectomy had significant effect on reducing prostate-cause mortality at 12-year follow-up. We found significant lower prostate-cause mortality in patients with PSA10 and GS≥7 scores who had undergone radical prostatectomy compared with patients in watchful waiting group. In addition, younger patients undergoing surgery developed lower distant metastases rate compared to another approach. Watchful waiting had a significant effect on erectile and urinary incontinence during 2 years. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between radical prostatectomy and watchful waiting on all-cause mortality. However, the radical prostatectomy was associated with statistically lower prostate-cause mortality and metastases rates. Compared with older men, younger men experienced better clinical outcomes. Moreover, watchful waiting had better effect on reducing erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence among patients during 2 years compared to radical prostatectomy.
机译:背景:本研究旨在比较接受前列腺癌根治术的临床局部前列腺癌患者与长期观察患者的长期临床和功能结局。方法:从开始到2018年1月,对PubMed,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册和相关标志物研究的参考清单进行了仔细检查。两名评价者独立进行了纳入试验的数据和质量评估。使用Cochrane检查表评估纳入研究的质量。使用随机效应模型下的逆方差和Mantel-Haenszel估计将结果合并为具有95%置信区间的相对风险。异质性通过使用I2进行评估。结果:包括3项1568名参与者的随机对照试验。与等待观察相比,根治性前列腺切除术对12年随访的全因死亡率没有显着影响。然而,在12年的随访中,根治性前列腺切除术对降低前列腺癌致死率具有显著作用。我们发现接受前列腺癌根治术的PSA> 10和GS≥7评分的患者与观察等待组的患者相比,前列腺癌的死亡率显着降低。此外,与另一种方法相比,接受手术的年轻患者远处转移率更低。观察等待对两年内的勃起和尿失禁有显着影响。结论:前列腺癌根治术与全因死亡率观察观察之间无显着差异。但是,根治性前列腺切除术与统计学上较低的前列腺癌死亡率和转移率相关。与年长的男性相比,年轻的男性临床效果更好。而且,与前列腺癌根治术相比,在2年内观察等待对减少勃起功能障碍和尿失禁的效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号