首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology >Concurrent Use Of Metered Dose Inhalers Without Spacer And Dry Powder Inhalers By Asthmatic Children Adversely Affect Proper Inhalation Technique
【24h】

Concurrent Use Of Metered Dose Inhalers Without Spacer And Dry Powder Inhalers By Asthmatic Children Adversely Affect Proper Inhalation Technique

机译:哮喘儿童同时使用不带间隔吸入器和干粉吸入器的定量吸入器不利地影响正确的吸入技术

获取原文
           

摘要

Asthma is a common chronic disease of children. A good control of symptoms will improve quality of patient life. Inhalation technique is an important aspect in the management of asthma. The better the inhalation technique the better the lung deposition of asthma therapy especially inhaled corticosteroids. This will lead to better control of symptoms and improve adherence to treatment. In the following study the inhalation technique of asthma devices were compared using inhalation technique score system. The asthma devices studied were metered dose inhalers (pressurized MDI) without spacers and dry powder inhalers (DPI). The hypothesis studied was that the inhalation technique score of dry powder inhalers will be adversely affected with concurrent use of metered dose inhalers without spacers. Introduction The purpose of the current study was to examine whether asthmatic children using multiple types of inhalers demonstrate poor inhalation technique scores in comparison to those patients using only one type of inhaler. The working hypothesis is that the inhalation technique score for the dry powder inhalers (DPI) when used in combination with the metered dose inhaler (pressurized MDI without spacer) will exhibit lower inhalation technique scores than when DPI are used alone.Pediatric outpatients (n=97) at Farwania Hospital who regularly used pMDI and /or DPI (Turbuhaler or Diskus) asthma inhalers were evaluated. Methods Informed consent was obtained from caregivers of 97 outpatient asthmatic children at the Asthma Clinic in Farwania Hospital. All subjects met the inclusion criteria, i.e. asthmatics on inhaled asthma therapy and able to perform inhalation technique for the medication they were using.The DPI inhalers investigated were Turbuhaler (TH; AstraZeneca) or Diskus (DK; GlaxoWellcome). Subjects used one of these DPI inhalers alone or in combination with pMDI. All pMDI were HFA type. The old CFC inhalers contain chlorofluorocarbons, which harm the ozone layer. Replacements of CFCs have been available since 1996, and are known as HFAs (hydrofluoroalkanes). HFA inhalers provide the same level of safety and efficacy as CFC inhalers, but without harming the ozone layer (the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (15).The technique of pMDI without spacer is different than pMDI with spacer. The actuation inhalation coordination is crucial for pMDI while this is not important if using a spacer. In is a common practice for children older than 6 years to use pMDI without spacer because of portability and cost issues. Assessments were performed in the outpatient clinic. The inhalation technique was evaluated during the clinic visit and scored using a modified inhaler-specific checklist adapted from the Dutch Asthma Foundation technique score. These patients received inhalation technique instruction from the asthma clinic if they were follow-up patients, or alternatively received instruction from outside the asthma clinic if they were new patients to the clinic. All consenting patients who were taking inhaled treatments for asthma were recruited for this study. A well trained investigator, using inhaler-specific checklists adapted from the Dutch Asthma Foundation (12) assessed the patients’ inhalation technique with their prescribed asthma inhalers (tables 1-3). The total score was obtained by multiplication of all the scores then multiplying the total by 100 to get a percent score. Steps of inhalation technique were given certain score according to the importance and degree of accuracy (2-5). The investigator counted the number of correct steps in a child’s technique, with each step assigned certain point. The total points were then divided by the maximum points and further multiplied by 100 to determine a percentage score. This system incorporates the relative importance of each step in the inhalation technique. For each inhaler, items essential to the delivery of active drug into the lungs were identified. The
机译:哮喘是儿童的常见慢性疾病。良好地控制症状将改善患者生活质量。吸入技术是控制哮喘的重要方面。吸入技术越好,哮喘治疗尤其是吸入皮质类固醇的肺部沉积效果越好。这将导致更好地控制症状并改善对治疗的依从性。在以下研究中,使用吸入技术评分系统比较了哮喘设备的吸入技术。所研究的哮喘设备是不带垫片的定量吸入器(加压MDI)和干粉吸入器(DPI)。所研究的假设是,干粉吸入器的吸入技术得分会因同时使用无间隔的计量吸入器而受到不利影响。引言本研究的目的是检查与仅使用一种吸入器的哮喘患者相比,使用多种吸入器的哮喘儿童是否表现出较差的吸入技术评分。可行的假设是,与单独使用DPI的干粉吸入器(DPI)配合定量吸入器(无间隔物的加压MDI)结合使用时,其吸入技术得分将较低。 97)在Farwania医院评估了定期使用pMDI和/或DPI(Turbuhaler或Diskus)哮喘吸入器的患者。方法从法瓦尼亚医院哮喘诊所的97名门诊哮喘儿童的监护人那里获得知情同意。所有受试者均符合入选标准,即接受哮喘吸入治疗的哮喘患者并能够对其所用药物进行吸入技术研究.DPI吸入器为Turbuhaler(TH; AstraZeneca)或Diskus(DK; GlaxoWellcome)。受试者单独或与pMDI结合使用这些DPI吸入器之一。所有pMDI均为HFA类型。旧的CFC吸入器包含氯氟烃,会损害臭氧层。自1996年以来就已经有CFC的替代品,它们被称为HFA(氢氟烷烃)。 HFA吸入器提供的安全性和功效与CFC吸入器相同,但不会损害臭氧层(《关于消耗臭氧层物质的蒙特利尔议定书》(15)。不带间隔物的pMDI技术与带间隔物的pMDI不同。吸入协调对于pMDI至关重要,但如果使用间隔垫则不重要;由于便携性和成本问题,对于6岁以上的儿童,不带间隔垫使用pMDI是一种常见的做法,在门诊进行评估。在门诊就诊期间对患者进行了评估,并使用根据荷兰哮喘基金会技术评分标准修改后的针对吸入器的检查表进行评分:如果这些患者是随访患者,则接受哮喘诊所的吸入技术指导,或者接受哮喘以外的指导如果他们是该诊所的新患者。所有接受吸入治疗的同意患者招募了这项研究的人。一名训练有素的研究人员使用了根据荷兰哮喘基金会(12)改编的特定于吸入器的清单,评估了患者使用其处方的哮喘吸入器的吸入技术(表1-3)。总分数是通过将所有分数相乘,然后再将总分数乘以100得到百分比分数得出的。根据重要性和准确性程度,对吸入技术的各个步骤给予一定的评分(2-5)。研究人员计算了儿童技术中正确步骤的数量,并为每个步骤分配了特定点。然后将总分除以最高分,再乘以100,以确定百分比得分。该系统结合了吸入技术中每个步骤的相对重要性。对于每个吸入器,确定了将活性药物输送到肺部必不可少的项目。的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号