...
首页> 外文期刊>International Research Journal of Medical Sciences >Novamin versus Sodium Flouride Iontophoresis: The “Salvage Crew” to the Rescue
【24h】

Novamin versus Sodium Flouride Iontophoresis: The “Salvage Crew” to the Rescue

机译:Novamin与氟化钠离子电渗疗法:“抢救人员”的救援

获取原文

摘要

Dentin Hypersensitivity(DH) is a commonly occurring condition in majority of population seeking dental treatment. Hence dentist need to pay a special attention for its treatment. Hence the present study aimed to evaluate and compare the desensitizing potential of novamin containing dentifrice and iontophoresis in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Forty Subjects with age group between 25-55 years with complaint of hypersensitivity to thermal, mechanical, sour stimulus were included in the study. DH was assessed using verbal rating scale. {VRS scores:0 - No discomfort, 1 - Mild discomfort, 2 - Moderate discomfort, 3 - Severe pain only during application of stimulus and 4 - Severe pain persisting after removal of stimulus}. Subjects who showed score of two or more were included. Subject with dental caries, broken teeth, any chronic systemic disease/cardiac pacemakers were excluded. Subjects were divided into Group1 (n-20) Novamin group, Group 2 (n-20) Iontophoresis group. DH was scored before initiating the treatment modalities, immediately after the treatment, one week and one month post operatively. Scores were subjected to Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Iontophoresis was more effective in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity than novamin group at week 1. However the difference in mean score between Iontopheresis and Novamin was not statistically significant at Pre-Op and 1 Month. Both Novamin containing dentifrice and iontophoresis can be considered as effective treatment modality in DH.
机译:牙本质过敏症(DH)是大多数寻求牙科治疗的人群中常见的疾病。因此,牙医需要特别注意其治疗。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较含诺华明的洁齿剂和离子电渗疗法在牙本质过敏中的脱敏潜力。该研究包括年龄在25-55岁之间的40位受试者,他们对热,机械,酸刺激过于敏感。用口头评定量表评估DH。 {VRS分数:0-无不适,1--轻度不适,2--中度不适,3--仅在施加刺激时出现剧烈疼痛,而4--在去除刺激后仍持续存在剧烈疼痛}。显示两个或两个以上得分的受试者。排除龋齿,断牙,任何慢性全身性疾病/心脏起搏器的受试者。将受试者分为第1组(n-20)Novamin组,第2组(n-20)离子电渗疗法组。在开始治疗方式之前,手术后立即,术后1周和1个月对DH进行评分。分数接受了Mann-Whitney和Wilcoxon Signed Rank测试。在第1周,离子电渗疗法比novamin组更有效地降低了牙本质过敏性。但是,在操作前和1个月时离子电渗疗法和Novamin之间的平均评分差异无统计学意义。含Novamin的洁齿剂和离子电渗疗法均可被视为DH的有效治疗方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号