...
首页> 外文期刊>International Research Journal of Medical Sciences >Prevalence of ESBL And AmpC ?-Lactamase in Gram Negative Bacilli in various Clinical Samples at Tertiary Care Hospital
【24h】

Prevalence of ESBL And AmpC ?-Lactamase in Gram Negative Bacilli in various Clinical Samples at Tertiary Care Hospital

机译:三级护理医院各种临床样本中革兰氏阴性杆菌中ESBL和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的患病率

获取原文

摘要

The rapid dispersal of antibiotic resistance as extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases in bacteria makes a major public health concern worldwide. It becomes essential to guide the clinicians about the Knowledge of their occurrence and the appropriate anti-microbial treatment. This study was done to evaluate the Prevalence of ESBL and AmpC β-lactamases and their antibiotic susceptibility in gram-negative clinical isolates were analyzed. Total 200 non repetitive clinical isolates of {Escherichia coli (n=101), Klebsiella spp (n=41), Citrobacter spp. (n=22), Pseudomonas spp. (n=20), Proteus spp.(n=5), Acinetobacter spp.(n=7) and Enterobacter spp.( n=4)} obtained over a period from (January to August, 2014), were screened by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method for ESBLs and AmpC production and suspected isolates were confirmed by combined disc and AmpC disc tests. From 117(58.5%) and 62 (31%) screened out isolates, 87(43.5%) and 44(22%) were found to be ESBL and AmpC producers respectively. The distribution of ESBL and AmpC isolates organism wise showed E.coli (44.5% and 21.9%), Klebsiella spp (41.4% and 24.3%), Pseudomonas spp. (30% and 20%) and Acinetobacter spp (28.6 and 14.3%) respectively and they were found significantly multidrug resistance too. The co-existence phenotype of both ESBLs and AmpC were 23(11.5%) isolates. In our hospital moderate prevalence of ESBLs and AmpC was found. Combination disc test was effective for ESBL detection While the AmpC disc test, was found to be a convenient, specific and highly sensitive. Regular monitoring is necessary for the incidence of the ESBL and AmpC β-lactamase production by organisms.
机译:作为扩展谱的β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶,抗生素耐药性的快速传播在全世界引起了人们的重大公共卫生关注。指导临床医生有关其发生的知识以及适当的抗微生物治疗至关重要。这项研究旨在评估ESBL和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的患病率,并分析其在革兰氏阴性临床分离株中的抗生素敏感性。共有200种非重复性临床分离株,分别为{大肠杆菌(n = 101),克雷伯菌属(n = 41),柠檬酸杆菌属。 (n = 22),假单胞菌属。 Kirby筛选了(n = 20),变形杆菌属(n = 5),不动杆菌属(n = 7)和肠杆菌属(n = 4)}(从2014年1月至8月)通过结合的光盘和AmpC光盘测试确认了用于ESBL和AmpC生产的Bauer光盘扩散方法以及可疑分离株。从117株(58.5%)和62株(31%)筛选出的分离物中,发现87(43.5%)和44(22%)分别是ESBL和AmpC生产者。 ESBL和AmpC分离株的生物分布合理地显示大肠杆菌(44.5%和21.9%),克雷伯菌属(41.4%和24.3%),假单胞菌属。 (30%和20%)和不动杆菌属(28.6和14.3%),它们也被发现具有显着的多药耐药性。 ESBLs和AmpC的共存表型是23(11.5%)分离株。在我们医院,发现了ESBLs和AmpC的中度患病率。组合光盘测试对ESBL检测是有效的,而AmpC光盘测试被认为是方便,特异性和高度敏感的。定期监测对于有机物产生ESBL和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的发生率是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号