首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Statistics and Applications >Comparing the Crash Injury Severity Risk Factors at High-Volume and Low-Volume Intersections with Different Traffic Control in Alabama
【24h】

Comparing the Crash Injury Severity Risk Factors at High-Volume and Low-Volume Intersections with Different Traffic Control in Alabama

机译:在阿拉巴马州使用不同交通管制的大容量和小容量交叉口的碰撞伤害严重性风险因素比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Typically, intersections that carry more traffic will have more crashes; however, these crashes might not be severe. On the other hand, low-volume intersections might have lower number of crashes; however, can be more severe than their high-volume counterparts. Since the geometric and traffic characteristics of signalized and stop-controlled intersections are different, the significant factors affecting crash severity at both intersection types will be also different. This paper identifies and compares those significant factors affecting crash severity at high- and low-volume signalized and stop-controlled intersections in Alabama using five-year crash data from 2010 to 2014. A cut-off value of 1,000 vehicles/day was used to classify intersections as high-volume vs. low-volume. Method: A random forest model was used to rank variable importance and a binary logit model was applied to identify the significant factors at both high- and low-volume signalized and stop-controlled intersections. Four discrete models (high-volume signalized, low-volume signalized, high-volume stop-controlled, and low-volume stop-controlled) were developed. Roadway, traffic, vehicle, driver, and environmental characteristics were used as independent variables in the models. Results: In all four models, crashes in rural areas showed higher severity compared to urban areas and right-turning maneuver showed relatively lesser severity. Rear-end crashes showed lower severity compared to side impacts at high- and low-volume stop-controlled and high-volume signalized intersections. Head-on crashes, driving under influence (DUI) of alcohol/drugs, and increase in driver age showed higher severity at high- and low-volume signalized intersections. Motorcycles were associated with higher severity at high- and low-volume signalized intersections, as well as high-volume stop-controlled intersections. Conclusions: Most of the factors with the highest ranking from the random forest model were found significant in the binary logit models. Strategies to alleviate crash severity at different intersections are suggested. Practical Applications: Since the left-turning vehicle maneuver showed higher severity likelihood at high-volume signalized intersections, providing enough sight distance and protected left turn phase (with no permitted phase) in busy intersections is suggested. Also, education programs should be designed disseminating the dangerous effect of DUI on crash severity while crossing signalized intersections.
机译:目标:通常情况下,载流量更多的路口会发生更多的车祸;但是,这些崩溃可能并不严重。另一方面,小数量的交叉路口的撞车次数可能会更少;但是,可能比其高容量同类产品更为严重。由于信号交叉口和停车控制交叉口的几何和交通特性不同,因此影响两种交叉口类型的碰撞严重性的重要因素也将不同。本文使用2010年至2014年的五年碰撞数据,识别并比较了影响阿拉巴马州高,低通量信号灯和停车控制路口碰撞严重程度的那些重要因素。使用了每天1,000辆的临界值将相交分类为大体积与小体积。方法:使用随机森林模型对变量的重要性进行排序,并使用二进制logit模型识别在高通量和低通量信号交叉口和停车控制交叉口处的重要因素。开发了四个离散模型(高信号量,低信号量,大容量停止控制和小容量停止控制)。道路,交通,车辆,驾驶员和环境特征被用作模型中的自变量。结果:在所有四个模型中,农村地区的撞车事故的严重程度均高于城市地区,右转弯的事故的严重程度相对较低。与高和小数量的停车控制和大数量的信号交叉口的侧面碰撞相比,追尾事故的严重性要低。在高容量和低容量的信号交叉口,正面碰撞,酒精/药品的影响(DUI)驾驶以及驾驶员年龄的增加显示出更高的严重性。摩托车在高通量和低通量信号交叉口以及大通量停车控制路口的严重性更高。结论:随机森林模型中排名最高的大多数因素在二元logit模型中均具有重要意义。提出了减轻不同路口碰撞严重性的策略。实际应用:由于在大信号交叉口处,左转弯车辆的机动性显示出更高的严重性可能性,因此建议在繁忙的交叉路口提供足够的视距并保护左转弯相位(无相位)。同样,应该设计教育程序,以传播DUI在穿越信号交叉路口时对撞车严重性的危险影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号