...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >A comparative study between PGE1 and PGE2 for induction of labour in premature rupture of membrane at term
【24h】

A comparative study between PGE1 and PGE2 for induction of labour in premature rupture of membrane at term

机译:PGE1和PGE2在足月胎膜早破引产中的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Premature rupture of membranes at term can be managed expectantly with good results. However, low bishop score may lead to undue latency. It can lead to complications if no intervention done. So, timely intervention by labour induction in selected cases can improve maternal and fetal outcome. Prostaglandins has very vital role for induction of labour. This study is to compare the effectiveness between the two molecules of prostaglandins PGE1 and PGE2 for induction of labour in term premature rupture of membrane (PROM). Methods: It is a prospective interventional study performed at a tertiary hospital attached to a medical college. It was conducted upon randomly selected 100 women of term PROM from April 2011 to April 2015. They were divided into two comparable groups each containing 50 women. Both the groups were comparable in age, parity and bishop score. One group was induced with PGE1 (Tab Misoprostol) and the other with PGE2 (Dinoprostone gel). Results: Among 100 women, a good number of women were primigravida (76%). Majority of women were induced in between 6 to 12 hours after PROM (69%). Vaginal deliveries were 68% in tab. Misoprostol group while 80% in dinoprostone gel group which are comparable in both the groups. The significant difference observed was average induction delivery interval, which was 11.26 hours in tab. misoprostol group and 14.72 hours in dinoprostone gel group (P=0.004). The other women (26%) underwent cesarean section. Among them 46.15% were done for fetal distress and 43.84% for induction failure. Conclusions: Both the molecules of prostaglandins are efficient for labour induction in term PROM. Though, PGE1 (tab. Misoprostol) is faster acting as compare to PGE2 (dinoprostone gel) even with low bishop score. But it can lead to complications like hyperstimulation, fetal distress and postpartum hemorrhage if not used properly. So, tab misoprostol is not a safe drug where continuous monitoring of women is not available.
机译:背景:足月胎膜早破可以得到良好的治疗。但是,较低的主教分数可能会导致不必要的延迟。如果不进行干预,可能会导致并发症。因此,在选定的病例中通过引产的及时干预可以改善母婴结局。前列腺素对于引产具有非常重要的作用。这项研究旨在比较前列腺素PGE1和PGE2两种分子在足月胎膜早破(PROM)中引产的有效性。方法:这是在医学院附属三级医院进行的一项前瞻性干预研究。该研究是从2011年4月至2015年4月随机选择的100名足月妊娠妇女中进行的。将她们分为两组,每组包含50名妇女。两组的年龄,均等和主教分数均相当。一组用PGE1(Tab米索前列醇)诱导,另一组用PGE2(Dinoprostone凝胶)诱导。结果:在100名妇女中,有很多妇女是初产妇(76%)。多数女性在PROM术后6至12小时内被诱发(69%)。阴道分娩率为68%。米索前列醇组,而狄诺前列酮凝胶组中80%两组均相当。观察到的显着差异是平均感应递送间隔,在标签中为11.26小时。米索前列醇组和狄诺前列酮凝胶组14.72小时(P = 0.004)。其他妇女(26%)进行了剖宫产。其中胎儿窘迫占46.15%,诱导衰竭占43.84%。结论:两种前列腺素分子在足月PROM中均有效诱导引产。虽然,即使主教分数较低,PGE1(制片米索前列醇)的作用也要比PGE2(地诺前列酮凝胶)快。但是,如果使用不当,会导致过度刺激,胎儿窘迫和产后出血等并发症。因此,在无法持续监测女性的情况下,米索前列醇片不是安全的药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号