首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Assisted delivery of mobile fetal head: a comparison of forceps, vaccum and assisted manual extraction of head at caesarean section
【24h】

Assisted delivery of mobile fetal head: a comparison of forceps, vaccum and assisted manual extraction of head at caesarean section

机译:辅助分娩的胎儿头:剖宫产术中镊子,真空和辅助人工拔头的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Difficult fetal extraction occurs in 1-2% of caesarean deliveries. Either forceps or a vaccum device is often used to assist in delivery of the fetal head in cesarean section in high floating/mobile fetal head. This study compare the safety (for mother and fetus) and efficacy of forceps and vacuum assisted delivery of high floating/mobile fetal head with the traditional method of manual extraction at caesarean section. Methods: The sample size included 100 cases of LSCS with manual extraction of fetal head, 100 cases of LSCS with forceps assisted extraction of fetal head and 100 cases of LSCS with vacuum assisted extraction of fetal head. Results: Application of fundal pressure was required in all cases of manual extraction group, in 51 cases of forceps extraction group. None of the cases of vacuum extraction group required application of fundal pressure. The U-D interval in manual extraction group was 90.56±4.91 seconds, in forceps extraction group was 70.2±5.02 seconds and in the vacuum extraction group it was 62.3±2.03 seconds. In the manual extraction group, there was an estimated blood loss of 428±69.38 ml, 579±97.22 ml of estimated blood loss was present in forceps extraction group and in the vacuum extraction group it was 454±66.92 ml. Conclusions: This study reveals that with use of vacuum in CS for delivery of floating head, is superior than application of forceps and manual delivery in relation to time, blood loss and fundal pressure without any adverse effect on neonates and maternal complication.
机译:背景:剖宫产的1-2%发生困难的胎儿提取。通常使用镊子或真空装置来辅助在高漂浮/可移动胎儿头的剖宫产中递送胎儿头。这项研究比较了传统的剖宫产手动提取方法(对母亲和胎儿的安全性和有效性)以及镊子和高真空/可移动胎儿头的真空辅助分娩。方法:样本量包括100例人工取胎的LSCS,100例用镊子辅助取胎的LSCS和100例真空辅助取胎的LSCS。结果:手动拔牙组所有病例均需施加足底压,其中51例为镊子拔除组。抽真空组无一例需要施加底压。手动拔牙组的U-D间隔为90.56±4.91秒,镊子拔牙组的U-D间隔为70.2±5.02秒,真空拔牙组的U-D间隔为62.3±2.03秒。在手动提取组中,估计失血量为428±69.38 ml,在钳子提取组中估计失血为579±97.22 ml,在真空提取组中为454±66.92 ml。结论:这项研究表明,在CS中使用真空进行浮头分娩,在时间,失血和脚底​​压力方面,比使用镊子和手动分娩要好,并且对新生儿和产妇并发症没有任何不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号