首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Can single plasma glucose value 2 hours after 75g glucose (DIPSI criteria) replace the gold standard OGTT for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus?
【24h】

Can single plasma glucose value 2 hours after 75g glucose (DIPSI criteria) replace the gold standard OGTT for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus?

机译:75 g葡萄糖(DIPSI标准)后2小时的单个血浆葡萄糖值可以代替诊断妊娠糖尿病的黄金标准OGTT吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common medical complication of pregnancy associated with several fetal and maternal complications. There are several screening tools for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus including recent DIPSI criteria of non-fasting single plasma 2-hour value after 75 grams glucose (single step test). The present study was aimed at calculating prevalence of GDM, sensitivity and specificity using non-fasting single plasma 2-hour value after 75 grams glucose for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and to study the high-risk characteristics for GDM in this study population. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted for a period of one year. 750 antenatal women attending Antenatal outpatient department(OPD) with period of gestation 24-28 weeks were enrolled in the study. All women were first tested by 75 gm glucose and then by OGTT for confirmation. Prevalence rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were studied. History based questionnaire was used to study the risk characteristics for GDM. Results: Prevalence rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for patients were 14.13%, 73.58%, 95.03%, 70.90% and 95.67%. Among the risk factors 7.2% patients were more than 30 years in age. 0.93% had GDM in previous pregnancy.4.21% had GCA in previous pregnancy, 12.4% had SB/IUD/NND in previous pregnancy. 1.17% had previous pregnancy with birth weight more than 3.5 kg and 9.73% had family history of diabetes mellitus. Past history of GDM (50%) was the most common risk factor in GDM group followed by age 30 years (29.6%), and family history (24.6%). Conclusions: Screening using DIPSI criteria has good sensitivity and negative predictive values. It can serve as both screening and diagnostic test besides being simple, user friendly, cost effective and evidence-based test in less resource countries like India.
机译:背景:妊娠期糖尿病是妊娠的常见医学并发症,伴有多种胎儿和产妇并发症。有几种用于检测妊娠糖尿病的筛查工具,包括最近的DIPSI标准,即75克葡萄糖后2小时非空腹单血浆值(单步测试)。本研究旨在使用75 g葡萄糖后2小时非空腹单血浆值计算GDM的发生率,敏感性和特异性,以筛查和诊断妊娠糖尿病,并研究该人群中GDM的高危特征。方法:这是一项为期一年的前瞻性研究。该研究纳入了750名在产前门诊就诊的750名产前妇女,其妊娠期为24-28周。首先对所有女性进行75 gm葡萄糖测试,然后通过OGTT进行测试以进行确认。研究患病率,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。基于历史的问卷用于研究GDM的风险特征。结果:患者的患病率,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为14.13%,73.58%,95.03%,70.90%和95.67%。在危险因素中,有7.2%的患者年龄超过30岁。先前怀孕的GDM为0.93%,先前怀孕的GCA为4.21%,先前怀孕的SB / IUD / NND为12.4%。先前怀孕的孕妇中有1.17%出生体重超过3.5千克,而有糖尿病家族史的人中有9.73%。 GDM的既往史(50%)是GDM组中最常见的危险因素,其次是年龄> 30岁(29.6%)和家族史(24.6%)。结论:使用DIPSI标准进行筛查具有良好的敏感性和阴性预测值。除了在印度等资源匮乏的国家/地区进行简单,用户友好,具有成本效益和基于证据的测试外,它还可以用作筛查和诊断测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号