...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Comparative study of post-partum intra uterine contraceptive device insertion and interval intra uterine contraceptive device insertion in a tertiary care hospital
【24h】

Comparative study of post-partum intra uterine contraceptive device insertion and interval intra uterine contraceptive device insertion in a tertiary care hospital

机译:三级医院产后宫内节育器插入与间隔宫内节育器插入的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: NFHS (National Family Health Survey) 2005-2006 in India revealed that the contraceptive prevalence rate is 53.5%. 10% of all pregnancies are mistimed and 11% of all pregnancies are unwanted in India. Objective of present study was to compare the benefits and complications of postpartum IUCD insertion (PPIUCD) over interval IUCD insertion in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: It is a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Govt. Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem from 2009-2014. The cases of interval IUCD for the year 2009-2014 and PPIUCD cases for the year 2012-2014 both vaginal insertion and intracaesarean insertion were taken for study. Complications, benefits and reasons for removal were compared between the two groups. Results: The total number of cases of IUCD insertion significantly increased after the introduction of PPIUCD programme in 2012. The acceptance of IUCD insertion was steadily increasing after the introduction of PPIUCD even though the follow up of PPIUCD cases was less (32%). The rate of removal in patients who came for follow up was less in PPIUCD group (18%) compared to interval IUCD cases (57%) when the reason was menorrhagia. The most common reason for removal was menorrhagia in interval IUCD patients. Abdominal pain was the most common reason for removal in PPIUCD patients. The rate of expulsion was higher in PPIUCD (6%) compared to interval IUCD patients (1%). No cases of perforation and no cases of pregnancy in situ were reported in PPIUCD cases during the study period. Even though the rate of infection and missing strings were higher in PPIUCD patients when compared to interval IUCD patients who came for follow up the number of women with infection in PPIUCD patients is less and easily managed with appropriate antibiotics. Conclusions: In India PPIUCD insertion soon after delivery is a safe, effective, reversible and reliable method of long term contraception. Both vaginal and intracaesarean insertions are safe, efficacious and convenient even though there are few complications which are easily manageable. There are no incidences of perforations, pregnancy in situ, ectopic pregnancy and low rates of infection. Hence PPIUCD is a promising approach to decrease the fertility rate in the field of family planning.
机译:背景:印度2005-2006年的NFHS(全国家庭健康调查)显示,避孕普及率为53.5%。在印度,有10%的怀孕时间不正确,而有11%的怀孕是不受欢迎的。本研究的目的是比较在一家三级护理医院中,插入产后IUCD(PPIUCD)相对于间歇性IUCD的益处和并发症。方法:这是一项在政府妇产科进行的回顾性研究。 2009年至2014年在塞勒姆的Mohan Kumaramangalam医学院。研究对象为2009-2014年间段IUCD病例和2012-2014年间PPIUCD病例,包括阴道插入和剖宫产。比较了两组的并发症,益处和移除原因。结果:2012年引入PPIUCD计划后,IUCD插入病例总数显着增加。尽管PPIUCD病例的随访较少(32%),但引入PPIUCD后IUCD插入的接受率稳步上升。 PPIUCD组随访患者的去除率(18%)比月经多因的间隔性IUCD患者(57%)少。移除的最常见原因是间歇性IUCD患者的月经过多。腹痛是PPIUCD患者最常见的原因。与间歇性IUCD患者(<1%)相比,PPIUCD患者的驱逐率更高(6%)。在研究期间,PPIUCD病例中未报告穿孔病例,也未报告原位妊娠病例。即使与间隔进行随访的IUCD患者相比,PPIUCD患者的感染率和遗漏率更高,但PPIUCD患者中感染女性的人数却较少,而且可以通过适当的抗生素轻松控制。结论:在印度,分娩后不久插入PPIUCD是一种安全,有效,可逆和可靠的长期避孕方法。阴道和剖宫产术都是安全,有效和方便的,即使并发症很少,也很容易处理。没有穿孔,原位妊娠,异位妊娠和低感染率的发生。因此,PPIUCD是降低计划生育领域生育率的一种有前途的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号