首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Evaluation of four phenotypic methods for the rapid identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
【24h】

Evaluation of four phenotypic methods for the rapid identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

机译:快速鉴定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的四种表型方法的评价

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a superbug has been recognized as one of the major pathogens in hospitals as well as community settings. The prevalence of MRSA is 30-70% and many studies have suggested an alarming rate of infections caused by this organism. In spite of modern diagnostic procedures and technological advancement, infections caused by MRSA still remain difficult to diagnose in developing countries like India. We tried to evaluate four phenotypic methods for the rapid identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the four phenotypic methods for the detection of MRSA by oxacillin disc diffusion, cefoxitin disc diffusion, HiCrome rapid MRSA agar and the latex agglutination test. Results: Among 542 Staphylococcus aureus isolated, 304 were methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and remaining 238 were methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Hence, the prevalence rate of MRSA in our study was 56.09%. Cefoxitin disc diffusion was found to be more specific and sensitive than oxacillin disc diffusion where as both HiCrome Rapid MRSA Agar and the latex agglutination tests showed similar specificity and sensitivity. Conclusions: The cefoxitin disc diffusion method, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) was found to be a reliable method for MRSA detection but it should be supplemented with some other method like latex agglutination to enhance the isolation rate of MRSA. We recommend that along with cefoxitin disc diffusion with another reliable method, preferably latex agglutination should be routinely used in all microbiology diagnostic laboratories to detect MRSA which help for its control of spread.
机译:背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是一种超级细菌,已被公认为医院和社区环境中的主要病原体之一。 MRSA的患病率为30-70%,许多研究表明由该生物体引起的感染率惊人。尽管现代诊断程序和技术进步,由MRSA引起的感染在印度等发展中国家仍然难以诊断。我们试图评估四种表型方法,以快速鉴定耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。方法:本研究评估了四种表型方法:奥沙西林片扩散法,头孢西丁片扩散法,HiCrome快速MRSA琼脂法和乳胶凝集试验检测MRSA的方法。结果:在分离出的542株金黄色葡萄球菌中,耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)304,对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)238。因此,我们研究中的MRSA患病率为56.09%。发现头孢西丁盘片扩散比奥沙西林盘片扩散更具特异性和敏感性,因为HiCrome快速MRSA琼脂和乳胶凝集试验均显示出相似的特异性和敏感性。结论:临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)推荐的头孢西丁片扩散法是检测MRSA的可靠方法,但应补充乳胶凝集等其他方法以提高MRSA的分离率。我们建议,连同头孢西丁片扩散用另一种可靠的方法,最好在所有微生物学诊断实验室中常规使用胶乳凝集来检测MRSA,以帮助控制其扩散。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号