首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Comparison of topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation
【24h】

Comparison of topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation

机译:人工小切口白内障人工晶状体植入术的局部麻醉与眼球周围麻醉的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is an alternative to phacoemulsification for high volume cataract surgery especially in developing countries. Aim of this study is to compare patient and surgeon satisfaction, anaesthesia related and post-operative complications following topical (TA) versus peribulbar anaesthesia (PA) for MSICS with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Observational study was done over a period of six months. Patients who underwent MSICS under TA and PA were prospectively evaluated for satisfaction with anaesthesia intraoperatively and four hours after surgery through a questionnaire. Any intraoperative or post-operative complications were also assessed. Surgeon satisfaction was also assessed by a questionnaire. Results: Out of 62 patients 28 underwent MSICS under TA and 34 patients under PA. There was no significant difference in age and co-morbidities between two groups. 88.24% had mild pain and 11.76% had moderate pain during PA which was statistically significant (P
机译:背景:手动小切口白内障手术(MSICS)是用于大容量白内障手术的超声乳化术的替代方法,特别是在发展中国家。这项研究的目的是比较人工晶状体(IOL)植入的MSICS患者(TA)与球周麻醉(PA)术后患者和外科医生的满意度,与麻醉有关的并发症以及术后并发症。方法:观察研究进行了六个月的时间。在术前和手术后四个小时,通过问卷对前瞻性评估接受TA和PA接受MSICS的患者的麻醉满意度。还评估了术中或术后并发症。还通过问卷调查评估了外科医生的满意度。结果:在62例患者中,有28例在TA下接受了MSICS,34例在PA下接受了MSICS。两组之间的年龄和合并症没有显着差异。在PA期间,有88.24%的人有轻度疼痛,有11.76%的人有中度疼痛,具有统计学意义(P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号