首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Evaluation of ultrasound guided verses nerve stimulator technique of interscalene brachial plexus block: insights from Indian multi-super specialty hospital
【24h】

Evaluation of ultrasound guided verses nerve stimulator technique of interscalene brachial plexus block: insights from Indian multi-super specialty hospital

机译:肌间臂臂丛神经阻滞的超声引导经节神经刺激器技术评估:来自印度多超级专科医院的见解

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: To provide adequate intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for orthopaedic surgery continues to be a procedural challenge. The administration of brachial plexus anaesthesia can be facilitated through nerve stimulation or by ultrasound guidance. Hence study was conducted to compare differences in these techniques in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block (ISSB). Methods: In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, 60 patients (Male=41, Female=19) were scheduled for orthopaedic shoulder and upper arm surgeries matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly allocated to either Ultrasound (US, n=30) group or Nerve Stimulator (NS, n=30) group through a computer-generated randomization. Results: There was significant difference between US and NS group with respect to average number of attempts taken, block performance time (BPT), onset of sensory and motor block, duration of motor block and patient satisfaction score. Whereas not much significant difference was observed in duration of sensory block, block success rate and incidence of post operative side effects. Conclusions: The results suggest that US guided ISBB is significantly superior to NS guided block in terms of faster onset of action; lower number of attempts to locate Interscalene brachial plexus; longer duration of block and overall success rate with favourable tolerability at real-life scenario.
机译:背景:为骨科手术提供足够的术中麻醉和术后镇痛仍然是手术上的挑战。臂丛神经麻醉可以通过神经刺激或超声引导来促进。因此,进行了研究以比较接受斜肌间臂丛神经阻滞(ISSB)的患者在这些技术上的差异。方法:在这项前瞻性,随机,观察者盲目的研究中,计划对60例患者(男41例,女19例)进行符合纳入和排除标准的骨科肩膀和上臂外科手术。通过计算机生成的随机分组将患者随机分配到超声(US,n = 30)组或神经刺激器(NS,n = 30)组。结果:US和NS组在平均尝试次数,阻滞执行时间(BPT),感觉和运动阻滞发作,运动阻滞持续时间和患者满意度评分方面存在显着差异。感觉阻滞的持续时间,阻滞成功率和术后副作用的发生率差异不明显。结论:结果表明,在起效更快的方面,美国引导的ISBB明显优于NS引导的阻滞。定位肌间沟臂丛神经的尝试次数较少;在现实生活中,更长的封锁时间和总体成功率以及良好的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号