首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Comparison of postoperative recovery from desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia using laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized comparative study
【24h】

Comparison of postoperative recovery from desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia using laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized comparative study

机译:使用喉罩气道从地氟醚和七氟醚麻醉中术后恢复的比较:一项前瞻性随机比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Ambulatory surgeries necessitate safe anaesthesia and faster recovery. Sevoflurane and desflurane are proved as such effective inhalational anaesthetic agents. The aim of this study was to compare early postoperative recovery profile in patient undergoing elective ambulatory surgical operations and receiving anaesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane using supreme LMA. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai, from August 2014 to April 2015. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving desflurane (Group D- n=40) and sevoflurane (Group S- n=40) for maintenance of anaesthesia. Patients were monitored for recovery by using fast track criteria (FTC) score at different time intervals. Results: The demographic characteristics, hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups and no statistical significance was seen among them (p>0.05). The mean time taken for postoperative recovery characteristics were significantly lower in in Group D than Group S (p=0.00). The FTC score was significantly higher in group D as compared to group S at all times (p<0.05) for thirty minutes. The prevalence of consuming additional analgesic was 12.5% in group D and 15% in group S (p=1.000). The additional antiemetic requirement was seen in 10% patients in both the groups (p=1.000).The incidence of coughing was seen in among 5% of Group D patients and in none among Group S (p=0.152). Conclusion: The study concludes that desflurane is superior to sevoflurane with respect to time of eye opening, response to verbal commands, orientation, ability to sit, early recovery profile and duration of stay in recovery room.
机译:背景:非卧床手术需要安全麻醉和更快的恢复。七氟醚和地氟醚被证明是有效的吸入麻醉剂。这项研究的目的是比较接受择期门诊外科手术并接受使用最高LMA的七氟醚或地氟烷麻醉的患者的早期术后恢复情况。方法:这项前瞻性研究于2014年8月至2015年4月在孟买Jaslok医院和研究中心G. Deshmukh Marg博士进行。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受地氟醚(D-n = 40)和七氟醚(组S-n = 40)以维持麻醉。通过在不同时间间隔使用快速跟踪标准(FTC)评分监测患者的恢复情况。结果:两组的人口统计学特征,血流动力学参数均相当,且无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。 D组术后恢复特征所需的平均时间显着低于S组(p = 0.00)。在30分钟内,D组的FTC得分始终高于S组(p <0.05)。在D组中服用其他镇痛剂的患病率为12.5%,在S组中为15%(p = 1.000)。两组中有10%的患者出现了止吐的额外需求(p = 1.000).D组中5%的患者出现了咳嗽的发生率,S组中没有咳嗽的发生率(p = 0.152)。结论:研究得出结论,就开眼时间,对口头命令的反应,方向,坐姿的能力,早期恢复情况和在恢复室的停留时间而言,地氟醚优于七氟醚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号