...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Clinico-microbiological study of community acquired and health care associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft tissue infections
【24h】

Clinico-microbiological study of community acquired and health care associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft tissue infections

机译:皮肤和软组织感染引起的社区获得性和医疗相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的临床微生物学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has long been a problematic pathogen, confined largely to hospitals and health care environments. But in the past decade, resistant strains have begun to appear among healthy community members without the traditional health care associated risk factors. In the present study, we sought to determine the prevalence of community acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and health care associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) among patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs ) and to study the differences between these with respect to clinical features, risk factors and antibiotic sensitivity patterns. Methods: 100 consecutive Staphyococcus aureus isolates from each from community acquired and health care associated SSTIs (a total of 200 isolates) were studied. Standard identification protocols were employed and antibiotic susceptibility testing was interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. Results: The prevalence of HA- MRSA was 54% while that of CA- MRSA was 52%. Majority of the HA-MRSA infections occurred in patients with extremes of age. In contrast, majority of CA-MRSA patients were young children. History of hospitalization in the past one year and a history of surgery in the past three months were the significant risk factors for acquiring HA-MRSA. CA-MRSA found no significant association with the known risk factors. Though the antibiotic resistance to Cotrimoxazole, Erythromycin and Clindamycin were lower among CA-MRSA isolates when compared with HA-MRSA isolates (55.8% versus 85.2%; 76.9% versus 92.6 %; 19.3% versus 29.7%), the rates of resistance of CA-MRSA isolates to non ?2-lactam antibiotics were higher than expected. Conclusions: CA-MRSA strains are equally prevalent as HA-MRSA strains and can no longer be lightly regarded in the current scenario. Moreover the susceptibility of CA-MRSA strains to non ?2 lactam antibiotics seem to be decreasing and can no longer be used as defining criteria to differentiate them from HA- MRSA strains.
机译:背景:耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)长期以来一直是一个有问题的病原体,主要局限于医院和医疗环境。但是在过去的十年中,在没有传统的医疗保健相关风险因素的情况下,健康社区成员中开始出现耐药菌株。在本研究中,我们试图确定皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)患者中社区获得性MRSA(CA-MRSA)和与卫生保健相关的MRSA(HA-MRSA)的患病率,并研究两者之间的差异临床特征,危险因素和抗生素敏感性模式。方法:研究了来自社区和卫生保健相关的SSTI的100个连续金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(共200个分离株)。采用标准鉴定方案,并根据CLSI指南对抗生素敏感性试验进行解释。结果:HA-MRSA的患病率为54%,而CA-MRSA的患病率为52%。大多数HA-MRSA感染发生在年龄极端的患者中。相反,大多数CA-MRSA患者是幼儿。过去一年的住院史和过去三个月的手术史是获得HA-MRSA的重要危险因素。 CA-MRSA发现与已知的危险因素无显着关联。尽管与HA-MRSA分离株相比,CA-MRSA分离株对Cotrimoxazole,红霉素和克林霉素的抗生素耐药性较低(55.8%对85.2%; 76.9%对92.6%; 19.3%对29.7%),但CA耐药率非α2-内酰胺类抗生素的-MRSA分离物高于预期。结论:CA-MRSA菌株与HA-MRSA菌株同等流行,因此在当前情况下不再被轻视。此外,CA-MRSA菌株对非β2内酰胺类抗生素的敏感性似乎正在降低,因此不能再用作将其与HA-MRSA菌株区分开的定义标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号