...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Population Data Science >Combining Propensity Score and Random Coefficient Modelling as an Approach to Analyse Complex Longitudinal Data
【24h】

Combining Propensity Score and Random Coefficient Modelling as an Approach to Analyse Complex Longitudinal Data

机译:结合倾向得分和随机系数建模作为分析复杂纵向数据的一种方法

获取原文

摘要

ABSTRACT ObjectivesWe looked for an approach to analyze/visualize a set of repeated measures of renal laboratory data (eGFR [estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate] from an observational population-based data set) as safety parameters in a longitudinal design and calculate annual changes in different sub-cohorts. Previous meta-analyses had struggled to address this problem (due to poor data quality and strong heterogeneity in underlying historical studies) and previous large population-based observational studies had only looked into binary outcomes. Particular challenges lay (1) in the complexity of the data set with irregularly spaced observation points, (2) in the observational character of the data with associated bias and confounding by indication and co-medication and (3) in the change of lab method during the observation period. ResultsOut of a population base of 400.000 we analysed linked longitudinal data of more than 1000 eligible patients with over 1000.000 prescription records of index drug or co-prescription drugs. Data were provided by the Dundee University Health Informatics Centre (HIC). We addressed the differences in covariates (which typically can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects in observational studies) via individual propensity scores (to reduce this bias by balancing the covariates in the two groups) and a hierarchical modelling approach. A Random Coefficient Model (via proc mixed in SAS 9.3) proved a much more powerful statistical tool than analysis of covariance of the summary measure during follow-up, particularly as the latter approach is less efficient when applied to longitudinal data with missing data points and irregularly spaced repeated measures.Visualization was achieved with the SAS 9.3 GPLOT procedure combined with a spline function. The historical change in lab method was addressed via a conversion of lab results to an internationally recognized standard (IDMS aligned method). We were able to achieve plausible and more precise estimates of the annual decline in eGFR in the patient group of interest than previous attempts from other research publications. This led to a publication in a high profile journal. ConclusionOur approach of combining a Propensity Score and Random Coefficient Modelling was successful to answer a question in drug safety using repeated measurement data from a longitudinal observational population based data set. This approach may be useful for other research questions in Drug Safety or in Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research for continuous outcome measures.
机译:摘要目的我们寻找一种方法来分析/可视化一组重复测量的肾脏实验室数据(基于观察人群的数据集的eGFR [估计的肾小球滤过率])作为纵向设计中的安全参数,并计算不同分项下的年度变化队列。以前的荟萃分析一直在努力解决这个问题(由于基础质量研究的数据质量差和异质性强),而以前基于人群的大型观察性研究仅研究了二元结果。特殊的挑战在于(1)具有不规则间隔的观察点的数据集的复杂性,(2)具有关联的偏见和因适应症和联合用药而混淆的数据的观察特性,以及(3)改变实验室方法在观察期间。结果在40万人口中,我们分析了超过1000名符合条件的患者的关联纵向数据,这些患者具有超过1000.000的索引药物或共同处方药处方记录。数据由邓迪大学健康信息中心(HIC)提供。我们通过个体倾向性得分(通过平衡两组中的协变量来减少这种偏差)和分层建模方法来解决协变量之间的差异(通常会导致观察性研究中治疗效果的估计偏差)。随机系数模型(通过SAS 9.3中的proc混合)证明了统计工具比后续措施中汇总度量的协方差分析功能强大得多,尤其是当后一种方法应用于缺少数据点和数据的纵向数据时效率较低。 SAS 9.3 GPLOT程序结合样条函数实现了可视化。实验室方法的历史变化是通过将实验室结果转换为国际公认的标准(IDMS对齐方法)解决的。与其他研究出版物之前的尝试相比,我们能够对感兴趣的患者组中eGFR的年度下降进行合理且更准确的估计。这导致在高知名度期刊上发表文章。结论我们结合倾向得分和随机系数建模的方法使用来自纵向观察人群的数据集的重复测量数据成功回答了药物安全性问题。这种方法可能对药物安全性或连续结果测量的比较临床有效性研究中的其他研究问题有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号