...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pharmacological Research >Medical students’ task based learning of P-drug concept – A study to know its effectiveness and participant feedback
【24h】

Medical students’ task based learning of P-drug concept – A study to know its effectiveness and participant feedback

机译:医学生基于任务的P药物概念学习–一项了解其有效性和参与者反馈的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To study the effectiveness of task based learning of P-drug concept among 2 nd year medical students in India. Methods: This was an interventional study carried out among two groups of 41medical students each. P-drug concept was introduced to both the groups as a power point aided lecture class. Later, students from group B were assigned a task of preparing a list of P drugs for commonly diagnosed illness in our hospital. Six months after the intervention, knowledge and skills regarding P drug selection was assessed. The results were expressed as counts and percentages. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test. Student feedback was also taken. Results : Group B showed statistically significant better understanding of P drug concept when compared to group A(p< 0.05). Among group B students 59% were able to rearrange the steps for selecting P drugs in correct order which was significant (p< 0.05), compared to 37% from group A. For determining suitability of drug, 75.6% students from group A and 49% from group B gave importance to patient related factors. Drug related factors were considered important by 19% students from group A and 37% from group B. Group B students (29%) showed statistically significant (p <0.05) better understanding of the concept of essential medicines when compared to 10% students from group A. Conclusion: Feedback from interventional group was positive and encouraging. Performing a task provided them to learn better about P drug concept.
机译:目的:研究印度2年级医学生基于任务的P药物概念学习的有效性。方法:这是一项对两组41名医学生进行的干预性研究。将P药物概念引入了这两个小组,作为简报辅助讲课。后来,B组的学生被分配了一份准备在我院诊断为常见疾病的P药物清单的任务。干预六个月后,评估了有关P药物选择的知识和技能。结果表示为计数和百分比。使用卡方检验进行统计分析。还收集了学生的反馈。结果:与A组相比,B组对P药物概念有更好的统计学意义(p <0.05)。在B组学生中,有59%的人能够以正确的顺序重新安排选择P药物的步骤,这很有意义(p <0.05),而A组中的这一比例为37%。为确定药物的适用性,A组中的75.6%的学生和49人B组的%重视患者相关因素。 A组的19%学生和B组的37%学生认为与药物相关的因素很重要。B组的学生(29%)与10%的学生相比,对基本药物概念的理解具有统计学显着意义(p <0.05) A组。结论:干预组的反馈是积极的,令人鼓舞。执行任务使他们能够更好地了解P药物概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号