首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >A Difference That Makes a Difference? Reflexivity and Researcher Effects in an All-Foreign Prison
【24h】

A Difference That Makes a Difference? Reflexivity and Researcher Effects in an All-Foreign Prison

机译:有所作为的差异?全外国监狱的反身性和研究人员作用

获取原文
       

摘要

Today, researchers are expected to spend considerable energy describing and discussing their own social positions and personas in the field for at least two reasons: First, researchers always observe the field from a specific point of view. Their perspective is structured by their own social position and biography and is thus unique. Second, the people in the field react differently to the presence of different researchers. The field persona of the researcher is expected to impact the data she or he is able to produce. For these reasons, critically discussing one’s own field experiences is seen as an important part of the qualitative research process. This article will discuss the second part of this argument. Based on the experiences of two different researchers in the same field site, we ask whether it is true that different researchers necessarily produce different data. We conclude that in this case, at least, the differences between the two researchers did not seem to make much of a difference.
机译:如今,预计研究人员将花费大量精力描述和讨论他们在该领域的社会地位和角色,这至少有两个原因:首先,研究人员总是从特定的角度观察该领域。他们的观点是由他们自己的社会地位和传记构成的,因此是独特的。其次,该领域的人们对不同研究人员的反应不同。预期研究人员的现场角色会影响他或他能够产生的数据。由于这些原因,批判性地讨论自己的现场经验被视为定性研究过程的重要组成部分。本文将讨论该论点的第二部分。根据同一现场的两名不同研究人员的经验,我们问不同的研究人员是否必然产生不同的数据是否成立。我们得出的结论是,至少在这种情况下,两位研究人员之间的差异似乎并没有太大的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号