首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Doubly Engaged Ethnography: Opportunities and Challenges When Working With Vulnerable Communities
【24h】

Doubly Engaged Ethnography: Opportunities and Challenges When Working With Vulnerable Communities

机译:双重参与的人种志:与弱势社区合作时的机遇与挑战

获取原文
       

摘要

Understanding the unique challenges facing vulnerable communities necessitates a scholarly approach that is profoundly embedded in the ethnographic tradition. Undertaking ethnographies of communities and populations facing huge degrees of inequality and abject poverty asks of the researcher to be able to think hard about issues of positionality (what are our multiple subjectivities as insider/outsider, knowledge holder/learner, and so on when interacting with vulnerable subjects, and how does this influence the research?), issues of engagement versus exploitation (how can we meaningfully incentivize participation in our studies without being coercive/extractive, and can we expect vulnerable subjects to become deeply in research design/data collection, and so on when they are so overburdened already?), and representation (what are the ethics of representing violence, racism, and sexism as expressed by vulnerable respondents? What about the pictures we take and the stories we tell?). Through the discussion of our research on the behavioral patterns, socialization strategies, and garbage processing methods of informal waste pickers in Argentina and Mexico, we ask ourselves, and through this exercise, seek to shed light on the broader questions of how can we engage in ethnographies of vulnerable communities while maintaining a sense of objectivity and protecting our informants? Rather than attempting to provide a definite answer, we provide a starting point for scholars of resource governance interested in using ethnographic methods for their research. We highlight the challenges we’ve faced in studying cartoneros in Buenos Aires (Argentina) and pepenadores in León (Mexico) and engage in a self-reflective discussion of what can be learned from our struggle to provide meaningful, engaged scholarship while retaining and ensuring respect and care for the communities we study.
机译:要了解弱势社区面临的独特挑战,就必须有一种扎根于民族志传统的学术方法。对面临着巨大不平等和赤贫的社区和人群进行人种志研究,要求研究人员能够认真思考位置问题(与内部人/外部人,知识持有者/学习者等互动时,我们的多重主观性是什么?脆弱的主体,以及这如何影响研究?),参与与开发的问题(我们如何能够有效地激励人们参与研究而又不具有强制性/吸引力,我们能否期望脆弱的主体深入研究设计/数据收集,等等(如果它们已经负担太重了?)和表示(脆弱的受访者表示暴力,种族主义和性别歧视的道德观念是什么?我们拍的照片和我们讲的故事怎么样?)。通过讨论我们对阿根廷和墨西哥的非正式垃圾收集者的行为模式,社会化策略和垃圾处理方法的研究,我们自问并通过此练习,寻求阐明如何参与的更广泛问题。弱势社区的民族志,同时保持客观性并保护我们的线人?我们不是试图提供一个明确的答案,而是为有兴趣使用人种志方法进行研究的资源治理学者提供一个起点。我们重点介绍了我们在研究布宜诺斯艾利斯(阿根廷)的卡特内罗人和莱昂(墨西哥)的pepenadores时所面临的挑战,并就如何从我们的努力中汲取的经验教训进行反思,以提供有意义的参与性奖学金,同时保留并确保尊重和关心我们学习的社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号