...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >The feasibilities and practicalities of the integrated working journey: exploring the development and implementation of a whole population approach to delivering person-centred care within the United Kingdom
【24h】

The feasibilities and practicalities of the integrated working journey: exploring the development and implementation of a whole population approach to delivering person-centred care within the United Kingdom

机译:综合工作历程的可行性和实用性:探索在英国范围内开发和实施全民方法以提供以人为本的护理

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : The demographic shift of an ageing population increases demand on health and social care services, in a time of limited resources. Services are currently faced with the challenge of providing high quality, patient-centred care to a population who are increasingly living with multiple complex long-term conditions. This often results in care from multiple providers, subsequently increasing the risk of duplication, inefficiency, poor coordination and experience. Services therefore urgently need to work in partnership in order to deliver person-centred care. Methods : A qualitative study utilising in-depth semi-structured interviews with representatives from strategic roles was undertaken to explore perspectives of developing and implementing integrated services across organisations. The strategy includes a shift from working in organisational silos to delivering integrated care to the whole population. Primary data were collected in a rural setting within the United Kingdom. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results : Data were grouped into six themes including: focus and purpose of the integrated concept, multidisciplinary team working and engagement, professional roles and responsibilities, contextual factors and challenges of integration, expectations and the reality of integration, and aspirations and future goals for care delivery. Transferable key enablers for progression included a clear shared vision, organisational commitment, cultural change, individual behaviours and personalities, and period of stability in workforce and leadership. The systemic, organisational, and professional challenges experienced are likely to be represented across initiatives aiming to integrate care. Discussions : Despite extensive research and policy changes, initiatives continue to experience similar barriers in progression with integration and population health management. Robust case study designs and in-depth qualitative explorations into the experiences of those developing approaches to improve care delivery, add essential value to understanding associated barriers and facilitators. These findings are therefore highly relevant to those developing integrated care initiatives across international contexts. Conclusions : While a combination of relational and technical aspects are necessary for progression, the success of the initiative was largely perceived to be dependent upon the workforce, and individual behaviours and personalities rather than processes and structures. In light of the often underestimated lengthy process of large-scale system transformation and organisational change, it was apparent that the initiative remained in its infancy. As health services run on people and not processes, relational aspects and increased workforce investment may therefore hold the potential for success and sustainability of integrated approaches to care delivery. Lessons learned : The need to start small and scale up, invest time in building relationships and peer support, and focus on proactively supporting people, before expanding models, were highlighted. Limitations : Whilst the appreciation of the contribution of contextual factors to the challenges of integration are transferable, the case study nature may limit the applicability of some aspects. A further potential limitation includes the inferred organisationally representative nature of the participants in their perspectives of strategy development. Suggestions for future research : There is the need to develop approaches to measuring outcomes which account for impacts at the individual patient and professional level. Explorations into integrated workforce development is also advocated.
机译:简介:在资源有限的时期,人口老龄化导致人口对健康和社会护理服务的需求增加。当前,服务面临着为越来越多地生活在多种复杂长期状况中的人群提供高质量,以患者为中心的护理的挑战。这通常会导致多个提供商的照顾,从而增加了重复,效率低下,协调不善和经验不足的风险。因此,服务部门迫切需要合作以提供以人为本的护理。方法:利用来自战略角色的代表进行的深入半结构化访谈进行的定性研究,探索了跨组织开发和实施集成服务的观点。该战略包括从在组织孤岛上工作转变为向全体民众提供综合护理。原始数据是在英国农村地区收集的。使用主题分析方法记录和分析数据。结果:数据分为六个主题,包括:整合概念的重点和目的,跨学科团队的工作和参与,专业角色和职责,整合的背景因素和挑战,整合的期望和现实以及护理的愿望和未来目标交货。可转移的关键推动因素包括清晰的共同愿景,组织承诺,文化变革,个人行为和个性以及员工队伍和领导力的稳定时期。旨在整合护理的各项举措可能会代表所经历的系统,组织和专业挑战。讨论:尽管进行了广泛的研究和政策更改,但在融合和人口健康管理的发展过程中,举措仍遇到类似的障碍。健壮的案例研究设计和对开发方法的经验进行了深入的定性探索,以改善护理质量,为理解相关障碍和促进因素增加了必不可少的价值。因此,这些发现与那些在国际背景下制定综合护理计划的人高度相关。结论:虽然关系和技术方面的结合对于进步是必要的,但该计划的成功在很大程度上被认为取决于劳动力,个人行为和个性而不是过程和结构。鉴于经常被低估的大规模系统转型和组织变革的漫长过程,显然该倡议仍处于起步阶段。由于卫生服务以人而不是过程为基础,因此,关系方面和增加的劳动力投资可能具有成功实施和可持续实施综合护理方法的潜力。获得的经验教训:强调了从小规模开始扩大规模,在建立关系和同伴支持上投入时间以及在扩展模型之前专注于主动支持人员的需求。局限性:尽管可以理解上下文因素对整合挑战的贡献,但案例研究的性质可能会限制某些方面的适用性。另一个潜在的局限性包括,从战略发展的角度推断参与者的组织代表性。未来研究的建议:有必要开发一种衡量结果的方法,这些方法应考虑对个体患者和专业人士的影响。还提倡探索综合劳动力发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号