首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >The MediStori. A personal health record and standardised self-management toolkit which can improve integrated care systems
【24h】

The MediStori. A personal health record and standardised self-management toolkit which can improve integrated care systems

机译:MediStori。个人健康记录和标准化的自我管理工具包,可以改善综合护理系统

获取原文
           

摘要

An introduction: (comprising context and problem statement) Integrated care is critical in today’s health care settings. There are many causations for disintegrated services, but one critical component which may impact on the success of such projects in practice, could be said to be related to disconnected health information. This abstract sets out to show the benefits for all stakeholders in healthcare through delivering and implementing a standardised integrated personal health record (PHR) toolkit, which is continually updated and managed by a patient or carer, and promoted at the point of care by health professionals. The founder of this project, a patient and carer to three children with differing conditions, ascertained through lived experiences, that most acute health care settings were fragmented – many focusing on one disease at a time, meaning most often, a holistic viewpoint was not considered, thus impacting on issues such as comorbidity, medication reconciliation and disconnected health information. Initially for personal use, the founder created a toolkit, MediStori. The MediStori has a dual purpose – it is a paper-based PHR and it is a self-management toolkit. The major advantage of a PHR is that it collates all the relevant medical and related information concerning a patient in one place, in a manner that is helpful and usable (MacNeela, 2015) and could impact positively on integrated care in practice. Furthering from its original developments, progression of the toolkit to make it available to others was initiated; using co-design and quality improvement methodologies throughout. MediStori aimed to keep all of family’s information together, from birth to end-of-life; could help a patient or carer communicate relevant health information at the point of care in both primary and acute settings (a critical component for integrated care), and assist in the self-management of conditions in the home. As a patient is the only common denominator between all their health professionals, the principles upon which it was built were reliant on two theories 1) it should be promoted at the point of care and 2) integrated care should focus foremost on a person’s needs, and thereafter, the disease, because, irrelevant of conditions, patients all had similar issues: 1) Managing, understanding and adhering to medications, treatments or therapies 2) Accessing, managing and attending health appointments 3) Communicating, storing and managing personal health information 4) Coping with emotional, physical, social or financial impacts 5) Understanding diagnostics, diseases, terminology or services To investigate this theory, and progress the development of the toolkit, a national research project was funded by the Quality Improvement Division of the HSE. The research intervention included a national study on service users and health professionals to gain insights and feedback on the toolkit and their experiences of integrated health services. The study represented unique team collaboration between: Expert Patients; HSE Leads; Chief Pharmacists; Child Healthcare Coordinators; Clinical Nurse Specialists; General and Specialised Hospitals; National Charities; and an Academic Researcher, who oversaw and evaluated the outcomes of same. As integrated care is related to all disciplines, multiple surveys were used to elicit stakeholder input: one was community-based, through charity organisations and the second was of outpatients in acute hospital settings. Quantitative evaluations were triangulated between the settings using and the survey elicited considerable optional, qualitative feedback from participants. The collaborative approach to assess the cause and extent of the problem taken ensured that citizen perspectives, healthcare policy makers, organisations, NGOs, innovation developers and evaluation researchers could cooperate to achieve various goals: to assess the need for support around medication compliance, healthcare utilisation, information management – all needs associated with integrated care. Short description of practice change implemented : Clinical Nurse Specialists & Self- Management Coordinators were trained to deliver the study and toolkit to service users and it was in this instance where implementation of integrated care services was delivered. The pilot study at the two acute hospital sites were designed to take advantage of the patient wait of between 45 minutes to 90 minutes before being seen by a doctor at outpatient clinics. This was an opportunity to engage with patients to educate them on the benefits of self-management, self-care and engagement through adoption of a personal health record system. Training on medication management, symptom monitoring, and keeping important information together were given during this time. Patients were recommended to utilise the toolkit and bring it the various health professionals whom they engaged with. They were also advised to bring it back to return OP
机译:简介:(包含上下文和问题陈述)在当今的医疗保健环境中,综合医疗至关重要。分解服务的原因很多,但是在实践中可能影响此类项目的成功的一个关键因素可以说与健康信息的断开有关。本摘要旨在通过提供和实施标准化的综合个人健康记录(PHR)工具包来展示所有医疗保健利益相关者的利益,该工具包由患者或护理人员不断更新和管理,并在医护人员护理时加以推广。该项目的创建者是一名耐心照顾三个条件不同的孩子的人,通过亲身经历确定,大多数急性医疗保健机构是零散的-许多人一次只关注一种疾病,这意味着通常不考虑整体观点,因此会影响合并症,药物调和和健康信息断开等问题。最初供个人使用,创始人创建了MediStori工具箱。 MediStori具有双重目的–它是基于纸张的PHR,并且是一个自我管理工具包。 PHR的主要优势在于,它以一种有用且有用的方式在一个地方整理了与患者有关的所有相关医学和相关信息(MacNeela,2015年),并可能对实践中的综合护理产生积极影响。从其最初的发展出发,该工具箱开始向其他人开放。始终使用协同设计和质量改进方法。 MediStori的目标是将家庭的所有信息从出生到生命终结都保存在一起;可以帮助患者或护理人员在基层和急性环境(综合护理的关键组成部分)的护理点传达相关的健康信息,并有助于家庭条件的自我管理。由于患者是所有卫生专业人员之间唯一的共同点,因此患者建立的原则取决于两个理论:1)在护理时应予以提倡; 2)综合护理应首先关注患者的需求,此后,由于疾病,与病情无关,患者都有类似的问题:1)管理,理解和遵守药物,治疗或疗法2)访问,管理和参加卫生预约3)交流,存储和管理个人健康信息4)应对情感,身体,社会或财务方面的影响5)了解诊断,疾病,术语或服务为了研究该理论并促进工具包的开发,HSE质量改进部资助了一项国家研究项目。该研究干预措施包括一项针对服务使用者和卫生专业人员的全国性研究,以获取对该工具包及其综合卫生服务经验的见解和反馈。该研究代表了以下专家之间的独特团队合作:专家患者; HSE主管;首席药剂师;儿童保健协调员;临床护士专家;普通和专科医院;国家慈善机构;和一位学术研究人员,负责监督和评估相同的结果。由于综合护理涉及所有学科,因此使用了多项调查以征询利益相关方的意见:一项是通过慈善组织,以社区为基础,第二项是针对急诊医院的门诊患者。定量评估在设置和使用之间进行了三角划分,调查从参与者那里获得了大量可选的,定性的反馈。评估问题原因和程度的协作方法确保公民观点,医疗保健政策制定者,组织,非政府组织,创新开发商和评估研究人员可以合作实现各种目标:评估在药物合规性,医疗保健利用方面的支持需求,信息管理–与综合护理相关的所有需求。实施的做法变更的简短描述:临床护士专家和自我管理协调员接受了培训,可以为服务用户提供研究和工具包,在这种情况下,可以实施综合护理服务。在两个急性医院站点进行的初步研究旨在利用患者等待45分钟至90分钟之间的优势,然后在门诊诊所看医生。这是与患者互动的机会,通过采用个人健康记录系统,使他们了解自我管理,自我护理和参与的好处。在此期间,进行了药物管理,症状监测以及将重要信息保持在一起的培训。建议患者使用该工具包,并将其带给与他们合作的各种保健专业人员。还建议他们将其退还给OP

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号