...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease >Belatacept for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant patients: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy
【24h】

Belatacept for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant patients: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy

机译:Belatacept预防肾移植患者的器官排斥:基于证据的治疗位置回顾

获取原文

摘要

Background: Belatacept is a novel immunosuppressive therapy designed to improve clinical outcomes associated with kidney transplant recipients while minimizing use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Methods: We searched for clinical trials related to administration of belatacept to kidney transplant patients compared to various immunosuppression regimens, as well as for studies that utilized data from belatacept trials to validate new surrogate measures. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of belatacept’s effectiveness and safety in renal transplant recipients to better elucidate its place in clinical practice. Results: Analysis of the results from the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-Line Immunosuppressive Trial (BENEFIT) study, a de novo trial that compared cyclosporine (CsA)-based therapy to belatacept-based therapy in standard criteria donors, found a significant difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 13–15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 23–27 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 year and 7 years, respectively. The BENEFIT-EXT study was similarly designed with the exception that it included extended criteria donors. Renal function improved significantly for the more intensive belatacept group in all years of the BENEFIT-EXT study; however, it was not significant in the less intensive group until 5 years after transplant. Belatacept regimens resulted in lower blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant compared to CsA-based regimens. Results from conversion of CNIs to belatacept therapy, dual therapy of belatacept with sirolimus, and belatacept with corticosteroid avoidance therapy are also included in this article. Conclusion: The evidence reviewed in this article suggests that belatacept is an effective alternative in kidney transplant recipients. Compared to CNI-based therapy, belatacept-based therapy results in superior renal function and similar rates of allograft survival. In terms of safety, belatacept was shown to have lower incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes; however, incidence of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder and the cost of belatacept may hinder use of this medication.
机译:背景:Belatacept是一种新型的免疫抑制疗法,旨在改善与肾移植受者相关的临床结局,同时尽量减少钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)的使用。方法:我们搜索了与各种免疫抑制方案相比,对肾移植患者服用贝拉西普的临床试验,以及利用贝拉西普试验数据验证新替代措施的研究。这篇综述的目的是巩固已公开的贝拉西普在肾移植受者中的有效性和安全性的证据,以更好地阐明其在临床实践中的地位。结果:作为一项一线研究,对标准标准供体中以环孢霉素(CsA)为基础的治疗与以belatacept为基础的治疗进行了比较的从头试验,对作为一项一线免疫抑制试验的肾保护和功效的Belatacept评估结果进行了分析,发现1年时平均估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)分别为13–15 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 和23–27 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 和7年分别。 BENEFIT-EXT研究的设计类似,不同之处在于它包括扩大标准的捐助者。在BENEFIT-EXT研究的所有年份中,对强度更高的贝拉西普组的肾功能均有明显改善;然而,在低强度人群中,直到移植后5年才有意义。与基于CsA的方案相比,Belatacept方案可降低血压,胆固醇水平以及移植后新发糖尿病的发生率。本文还包括将CNI转换为belatacept疗法,belatcept与西罗莫司的双重疗法以及belatacept与皮质类固醇避免疗法的结果。结论:本文综述的证据表明,贝拉西普是肾移植受者的有效替代药物。与基于CNI的治疗相比,基于belatacept的治疗可带来更高的肾功能和同种异体移植存活率。就安全性而言,贝拉西普被证明具有较低的高血压,高脂血症和糖尿病发生率。然而,移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病的发生率和贝拉西普的费用可能会阻碍该药物的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号