首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >What Factors Influence Patient and Carer Engagement in Community Based Primary Health Care? Insights from People with Complex Care Needs and their Carers
【24h】

What Factors Influence Patient and Carer Engagement in Community Based Primary Health Care? Insights from People with Complex Care Needs and their Carers

机译:哪些因素会影响患者和护理人员参与基于社区的初级卫生保健?有复杂护理需求的人及其护理人员的见解

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : Patient engagement, defined loosely as “involving patients in their care” is a popular buzzword used across health systems internationally. Moving from paternalistic “providers know best” delivery models to those that foster collaborative partnerships between patients, families and providers is being increasingly emphasized within health systems. In order to best engage patients and families in their care it is critical to understand the factors that help or hinder such engagement. Community based primary health care (CBPHC), defined as the integration of primary care with community services is touted as an ideal place for such engagement activities to occur and is the context for this research. Theory/Methods : This study is part of a programme of research called Implementing integrated Care for Older Adults with Complex Health needs (iCOACH). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 112 participants: patients with complex needs (primarily older adults) and with informal carers across Canada (Ontario, Quebec) and New Zealand who were clients of selected CBPHC models. Interviews captured the characteristics and needs of patients and carers, and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were reviewed by multiple team members and a consensus codebook was created. Codes which captured unmet need, patient and provider communication and trust were extracted and analyzed inductively to identify patterns and factors which seemed to influence engagement. Results : Four primary barriers to engagement were identified: Perception of services; comfort in asking for things; beliefs about role; and access to resources. Patients and carers were reluctant to use what was available or offered to them due to perceptions of poor quality, which was shaped by previous experiences or observations of the care of others. Patients and carers were reluctant to ask for things due to perceptions that their needs could not be met or for fear of being reprimanded for voicing unmet need. Role beliefs such as perception of whether or not it was appropriate to question care providers or relinquish personal responsibilities (such as caregiving duties) played a role. Finally, factors such as a common language, adequate health literacy and access to financial resources influenced the extent to which patients and carers could engage with providers. Discussion : In this paper engagement encapsulated both the use and uptake of service as well as involvement in care interactions with providers. How patients and families perceive care, comfort in voicing their concerns, role beliefs and access and personal resources were identified as determinants to participation in health care. Conclusions: (comprising key findings) Creating an enabling environment for patient and carer engagement requires addressing their concerns about the quality of services; providing a safe space for patients and carers to voice their needs and concerns and have collaborative discussions with care providers; addressing feelings of guilt that may emerge among carers who don’t want to relinquish their roles and ensuring that patients and carers are provided with resources to enhance health literacy and access to care. Lessons learned : In order for patient and carer engagement to be an equitable practice addressing these barriers is required. Limitations : Insights from patients with cognitive impairment are not included in this study. Suggestions for future research : Future research can utilize co-design methodology to develop and test interventions with patients and carers that address these barriers in an effort to enhance participation in health care.
机译:简介:患者敬业度(宽松地定义为“让患者参与其护理”)是国际上整个卫生系统使用的流行术语。从家长式的“提供者最了解”的提供模式转变为促进患者,家庭和提供者之间的合作伙伴关系的提供模式,在卫生系统中越来越受到重视。为了使患者和家人更好地参与他们的护理,了解有助于或阻碍这种参与的因素至关重要。以社区为基础的初级保健(CBPHC),被定义为初级保健与社区服务的整合,被认为是开展此类参与活动的理想场所,并且是本研究的背景。理论/方法:这项研究是一项研究计划的一部分,该计划名为“实施具有复杂健康需求的老年人的综合护理”。对112名参与者进行了半结构化访谈:具有复杂需求的患者(主要是老年人)以及加拿大(安大略省,魁北克省)和新西兰的非正式护理人员,他们是某些CBPHC模型的客户。访谈记录了患者和护理人员的特征和需求,并进行了录音和逐字记录。多个团队成员对访谈进行了审查,并创建了共识密码本。捕获并满足未满足需求,患者与提供者之间的沟通和信任的代码,并进行归纳分析,以识别似乎会影响参与的模式和因素。结果:确定了参与的四个主要障碍:服务意识;索要东西的舒适性;关于角色的信念;和获取资源。患者和护理人员由于对质量的看法不佳而不愿使用现有或提供给他们的东西,这是由先前的经验或对他人照料的观察所形成的。患者和看护者由于无法满足他们的需求或害怕因未满足的需求而受到谴责而不愿提出要求。角色信念,例如对是否适合向医疗服务提供者提出质疑或放弃个人责任(例如护理职责)的看法,都起到了作用。最后,诸如通用语言,足够的健康素养和获得财务资源等因素影响了患者和护理人员与提供者互动的程度。讨论:在本文中,参与既封装了服务的使用和使用,也参与了与提供者之间的护理互动。患者和家庭如何看待护理,表达他们的疑虑的舒适感,角色信念以及获得机会和个人资源被确定为参与医疗保健的决定因素。结论:(包括关键发现)为患者和护理人员的参与创造有利的环境需要解决他们对服务质量的担忧;为患者和护理人员提供安全的空间,以表达他们的需求和疑虑,并与护理提供者进行合作讨论;解决不想放弃其角色的看护者可能出现的内感,并确保为患者和看护者提供资源以增强健康素养和就医机会。经验教训:为了使患者和护理人员的参与成为消除这些障碍的公平做法,是必需的。局限性:本研究不包括认知障碍患者的见解。对未来研究的建议:未来研究可以利用协同设计方法来开发和测试针对患者和护理人员的干预措施,以解决这些障碍,从而加强对医疗保健的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号