首页> 外文期刊>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. >Did legal regulations change the reporting frequency of sharp injuries of medical personnel? Study from 36 hospitals in ?ód? Province, Poland
【24h】

Did legal regulations change the reporting frequency of sharp injuries of medical personnel? Study from 36 hospitals in ?ód? Province, Poland

机译:法律法规是否改变了医务人员严重受伤的报告频率?从?ód?的36家医院研究波兰省

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: The aim of the study has been to analyze the epidemiological data on sharp injuries among health care workers before and after the implementation of regulations related to the conduct of the register of sharp injuries. Material and Methods: We hypothesized that the introduction of legislation would change the existing low reportability of sharp injuries and reporting incidents would increase. In Poland the binding regulations, dating back to 2013, require the employer to keep a record of sharp injuries. Therefore, we compared the data from before and after the entry regulations. Data was collected from the records of occupational exposure/accidents at work in hospitals in the ?ód? Province during 2010–2014. The feedback came from 36 hospitals (return index = 51.5%), representing a total annual average of 13 211 medical workers. Results: The incidence of injuries did not change significantly over the period 2010–2014, and the number of reported injuries in 2014 (the year when the Regulation had already been effective) was even lower than in the previous years. The average annual injury index was 12.31 injuries per 1000 employees (95% confidence interval: 11.48–13.16/1000). The incidence of injuries among nurses was significantly higher than in other groups of medical professionals (p Conclusions: The obligation to record occupational exposures set forth in current regulations is not likely to improve the reliability of reporting the incidents actually taking place. Further research should focus on identifying barriers to reporting cases of exposure to potentially infectious material. Action should be taken to raise awareness of medical personnel about the possible effects of exposure to infectious material, in particular, the benefits of the implementation of early post-exposure procedures. Perhaps it will increase the reporting frequency of sharp injuries of medical personnel. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(1):37–46
机译:目的:本研究的目的是分析在实施与严重伤害登记簿相关的法规之前和之后,医护人员中有关严重伤害的流行病学数据。材料和方法:我们假设立法的引入将改变现有的严重伤害的低可报告性,报告事件将增加。在波兰,具有约束力的法规可追溯到2013年,要求雇主保留严重伤害的记录。因此,我们比较了入境法规前后的数据。数据是从?ód?医院工作中的职业暴露/事故记录中收集的。 2010-2014年期间的省。反馈来自36家医院(回报指数= 51.5%),代表每年平均共有13 211名医务人员。结果:在2010年至2014年期间,受伤的发生率没有明显变化,2014年(该法规已经生效的那一年)报告的受伤人数甚至低于往年。年平均伤害指数为每1000名员工12.31伤害(95%置信区间:11.48–13.16 / 1000)。护士中受伤的发生率显着高于其他医疗专业人员组(p结论:现行法规中规定的记录职业暴露的义务不太可能提高报告实际发生的事件的可靠性。进一步的研究应关注在确定报告可能接触传染性物质的病例报告的障碍方面,应采取措施提高医务人员对接触传染性物质可能产生的影响的认识,尤其是早期实施暴露后程序的益处。 Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018; 31(1):37–46

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号