首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research >Regular (Landline) Phone Company versus Cellular Phone Company: The Non-Cooperative Case
【24h】

Regular (Landline) Phone Company versus Cellular Phone Company: The Non-Cooperative Case

机译:常规(座机)电话公司与蜂窝电话公司:非合作案例

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper we developed a model that has two important perspectives, theoretical and practical. From the theoretical point of view we develop a model of two different rival companies supplying different communication services whose objectives are profit maximization. Although the services somewhat overlap, they are certainly not complete substitutes. In some sense the services are substitutes but in another sense they can also be complements. These factors may lead to several optimal pricing policies of coordination and cooperation between the two companies. These results differ from the classical pricing policy of the well known regular duopoly case. The use of comparative static analysis have led to some straightforward results, however some other results are surprising, counter intuitive and in some sense even provocative.
机译:在本文中,我们开发了一个具有两个重要观点的模型,即理论和实践。从理论上讲,我们建立了两个提供不同通信服务的竞争对手的模型,它们的目标是利润最大化。尽管服务有些重叠,但它们肯定不是完全的替代品。从某种意义上说,服务是替代品,但从另一个意义上讲,它们也可以是补充。这些因素可能导致两家公司之间协调与合作的几种最优定价策略。这些结果与众所周知的常规双头垄断案例的经典定价策略不同。使用比较静态分析得出了一些简单明了的结果,但是其他一些结果却令人惊讶,反直观,从某种意义上说甚至是挑衅性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号