首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Business and Management >On the Reasons for the Vexing CSP-CFP Relationship: Methodology, Control Variables, Stakeholder Groups, and Measures. The Review of 63 Studies from 1990s
【24h】

On the Reasons for the Vexing CSP-CFP Relationship: Methodology, Control Variables, Stakeholder Groups, and Measures. The Review of 63 Studies from 1990s

机译:关于改变CSP-CFP关系的原因:方法论,控制变量,利益相关者群体和措施。 1990年代的63项研究综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Prior studies on the relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance are inconclusive. In the paper, we review 63 studies, and find (1) there are three methodology, which are empirical analysis, normative analysis and meta-analysis; (2) control variables, such as industry, size and risk, have been playing the important role in these studies; (3) different researchers discuss different stakeholder groups; (4) measures of both CSP and CFP are the complex phenomenon, and still uncertain. We assert that the variations of methodology, industries, control variables, stakeholder groups, and measures of both CSP and CFP should be responsible for the vexing relationship.
机译:关于公司社会绩效与公司财务绩效之间关系的先前研究尚无定论。在本文中,我们回顾了63项研究,发现(1)存在三种方法,即实证分析,规范分析和荟萃分析; (2)控制变量,例如行业,规模和风险,在这些研究中起着重要作用; (3)不同的研究人员讨论了不同的利益相关者群体; (4)CSP和CFP的措施都是复杂现象,尚不确定。我们认为,方法论,行业,控制变量,利益相关者群体以及CSP和CFP的度量方法的变化都应引起麻烦的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号