首页> 外文期刊>International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. >Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Children with Recurrent Acute Otitis Media in Italy
【24h】

Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Children with Recurrent Acute Otitis Media in Italy

机译:在意大利患有复发性急性中耳炎的儿童中使用补充和替代药物

获取原文
       

摘要

Controlling environmental factors, chemoprophylaxis, immunoprophylaxis and surgery are considered possible means of preventing recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM), but there are no available data concerning the paediatric use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). We evaluated the uses of CAM (homeopathy and/or herbal medicine) as means of preventing AOM in children with a history of RAOM. Eight hundred and forty Italian children with RAOM (?3 episodes in six months) aged 1–7 years were surveyed in 2009 using a face-to-face questionnaire, filled by parents or caregivers, that explored the prevalence, determinants, reasons, cost, and perceived safety and efficacy of CAM. About one-half (46%) of the children used CAM, significantly more than the number who used immunoprophylaxis (influenza vaccine 15%; p<0.05), PCV-7 34%; p< 0.05) or chemoprophylaxis (2%; p<0.001). Use of CAM in the family was the only important factor positively associated with the use of CAM in children (adjusted OR 7.94; 95% CI: 5.26–11.99). The main reasons for using CAM were a fear of the adverse effects of conventional medicine (40%) and to increase host defences (20%). CAM was widely seen as safe (95%) and highly effective (68%). CAM prescribers were paediatricians in 50.7% of cases; self-initiation was reported by 23% of respondents. CAM expenditure was between €25 and €50/month in 27.6% of cases and ? €50/month in 16%. Children with RAOM should be considered among the categories of subjects likely to be using CAM. Together with the fact that paediatricians are the main prescribers, this is worrying because of the current lack of evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CAM in the prevention of RAOM.
机译:控制环境因素,化学预防,免疫预防和手术被认为是预防复发性急性中耳炎(RAOM)的可能方法,但是尚无有关儿科使用辅助和替代药物(CAM)的可用数据。我们评估了CAM(顺势疗法和/或草药)作为预防具有RAOM病史的儿童AOM的方法的用途。 2009年,通过面对面调查表(包括父母或照顾者)调查了840名意大利儿童,年龄为1至7岁的RAOM(六个月内出现3次发作),调查了患病率,决定因素,原因,成本,以及CAM的安全性和有效性。大约一半(46%)的儿童使用CAM,明显多于使用免疫预防的人数(流感疫苗15%; p <0.05),PCV-7 34%; p <0.05)或化学预防(2%; p <0.001)。家庭中使用CAM是与儿童使用CAM呈正相关的唯一重要因素(校正OR 7.94; 95%CI:5.26-11.99)。使用CAM的主要原因是担心传统药物的不良反应(40%)和增加宿主防御能力(​​20%)。 CAM被广泛认为是安全的(95%)和高效的(68%)。 CAM开药者为儿科医生,占50.7%。 23%的受访者报告了自我启动。在27.6%的案件中,CAM的支出在每月25欧元至50欧元之间,并且? €50 /月,16%。患有RAOM的儿童应考虑可能使用CAM的受试者类别。再加上儿科医生是主要开药者,这一事实令人担忧,因为目前缺乏关于CAM预防RAOM的功效,安全性和成本效益的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号