首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Implant Dentistry >A prospective clinical study on implant impression accuracy
【24h】

A prospective clinical study on implant impression accuracy

机译:种植体印模准确性的前瞻性临床研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract BackgroundAn accurate impression is crucial to the long-term success of dental implants. This investigation evaluated the accuracy of the open and closed implant impression techniques in partially edentulous patients who received two adjacent implants.Material and methodsForty patients received Osstem Implants (Osstem Implant System, Seoul, Korea). Two impressions were made for each patient, one using an open tray and a second with a closed tray technique. The horizontal distances between two impression copings were measured and compared to similar measurements on the master casts. Also, under a stereomicroscope (AmScop14370, Myford Road, #150, Irvine, CA 92606 USA) at a 50-fold magnification, the presence or absence of the marginal discrepancies was evaluated.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences regarding horizontal measurements and in the marginal relationship for the two impression techniques, except between the anterior and posterior regions, for the closed tray technique. There were also no statistically significant differences in the impression accuracy between maxillary and the mandibular arches. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences for the intraoral horizontal distances, compared to similar horizontal measurements on master casts, between the open and closed tray techniques.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of the present study, there were generally no differences in the impression accuracy between the open and closed tray techniques in partially edentulous patients with two adjacent implants.
机译:摘要背景正确的印象对牙科植入物的长期成功至关重要。这项研究评估了开放式和封闭式种植体印模技术在接受两次相邻种植体的部分无牙的患者中的准确性。材料和方法40例患者接受了Osstem种植体(Osstem种植体系统,韩国首尔)。每位患者有两个印象,一个使用开放式托盘,第二个使用封闭式托盘技术。测量两个压痕顶盖之间的水平距离,并将其与主模型上的类似测量值进行比较。同样,在50倍放大率的立体显微镜下(AmScop14370,Myford Road,#150,Irvine,CA 92606 USA),评估了边缘差异的存在与否。结果水平测量和对于封闭式托盘技术,除了前部区域和后部区域之间的两种印模技术之间的边际关系。上颌和下颌弓之间的压印准确度也没有统计学上的显着差异。此外,与主模上类似的水平测量相比,开放式和封闭式托盘技术之间的口内水平距离没有统计学上的显着差异。结论在本研究的局限内,两者之间的印模精度通常没有差异在有两个相邻植入物的部分无牙的患者中使用开放式和封闭式托盘技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号