...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Comparison of CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging techniques in the assessment of the thermal ablation of liver tumors
【24h】

Comparison of CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging techniques in the assessment of the thermal ablation of liver tumors

机译:CT / MRI-CEUS与US-CEUS融合成像技术在肝肿瘤热消融评估中的比较

获取原文

摘要

To compare the applicability of fusion imaging between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (CT/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging) and fusion imaging between CEUS and ultrasound (US-CEUS fusion imaging) in the assessment of treatment response during liver cancer ablation. From August to December 2015, patients who underwent US-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors at our hospital with available CT/MRI images were enrolled consecutively. Both CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging were performed in all patients to evaluate treatment responses. The applicable rate, success rate of registration and duration time were recorded. Complications were monitored in the follow-up period, and CECT/MRI within three months were taken as the standard reference of technical efficacy. A total of 157 liver tumors (19?±?8?mm, range 8-55?mm) in 115 patients (54?±?11?years old, range 2 7~?84?years old) were enrolled. The applicable rate of US-CEUS fusion imaging was 61.1% (96/157) because of inconspicuous lesions in US, lower than that of CT/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging (99.7% (155/157)) (p??.05). However, the success rate of registration in US-CEUS fusion imaging (93.8% (90/96)) was superior to that of CT/MRI-US fusion imaging (81.3% (126/155)) (p??.05), especially for cases combined with alternative preablation surgeries or procedures (p??.05). The technical efficacy rate was 99.3% (150/151) according to the CECT/CEMRI. Both CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging are feasible means for intraprocedural immediate evaluation of treatment response for liver thermal ablation. US-CEUS fusion imaging is preferred because of its convenience and higher success rate of registration.
机译:比较造影增强超声(CEUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)(CT / MRI-CEUS融合成像)和CEUS与超声之间的融合成像(US-CEUS融合成像)之间的融合成像的适用性)评估肝癌消融期间的治疗反应。从2015年8月至2015年12月,我们连续纳入了在美国医院接受了美国引导的肝肿瘤热消融术并提供CT / MRI图像的患者。所有患者均进行了CT / MRI-CEUS和US-CEUS融合成像以评估治疗反应。记录适用率,注册成功率和持续时间。在随访期间监测并发症,并以三个月内的CECT / MRI作为技术疗效的标准参考。在115名54岁±11岁,2岁7〜84岁的患者中,共纳入157例肝肿瘤(19±±8?mm,范围8-55mm)。由于美国的病变不明显,US-CEUS融合成像的适用率为61.1%(96/157),低于CT / MRI-CEUS融合成像的99.7%(155/157)(p <<β)。 05)。但是,US-CEUS融合成像的配准成功率(93.8%(90/96))优于CT / MRI-US融合成像的配准成功率(81.3%(126/155))(p <0.05.05) ),尤其是与其他消融术或手术相结合的病例(p <0.05)。根据CECT / CEMRI,技术效率为99.3%(150/151)。 CT / MRI-CEUS和US-CEUS融合成像都是可行的方法,可在术中立即评估肝热消融的治疗反应。优选US-CEUS融合成像,因为它具有便利性和较高的套准成功率。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号