首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
【24h】

High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial

机译:稳定高碳酸血症性慢性阻塞性肺疾病的高压与高强度无创通气:一项随机交叉试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: High-intensity (high-pressure and high backup rate) noninvasive ventilation has recently been advocated for the management of stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the relative contributions of high inspiratory pressure and high backup rate to ventilator adherence and physiological outcome have not been investigated.Methods: Patients with stable hypercapnic COPD (daytime PaCO2 > 6 kPa) and nocturnal hypoventilation were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to high-pressure and high backup rate (high-intensity) and high-pressure and low backup rate (high-pressure) for a 6-week period. At the end of the first treatment period, patients were switched to the alternative treatment. The primary outcome measure was mean nightly ventilator usage.Results: Twelve patients were recruited, with seven completing the 12-week trial protocol. The mean patient age was 71 ± 8 years, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% ± 13% and FEV1 of 32% ± 12%. The baseline PaCO2 and PaO2 were 8.6 ± 1.7 kPa and 7.3 ± 1.4 kPa, respectively. There was no significant difference demonstrated in mean nightly ventilator usage between the high-intensity and high-pressure groups (difference of 4 minutes; 95% confidence interval ?45 to 53; P = 0.9). Furthermore, there were no differences in any of the secondary endpoints, with the exception of the respiratory domain of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire, which was lower in the high-intensity arm than in the high-pressure arm (57 ± 11 versus 69 ± 16; P < 0.05).Conclusion: There was no additional benefit, in terms of night-time ventilator adherence or any of the other measured parameters, demonstrated by addition of a high backup rate to high-pressure noninvasive ventilation. These data suggest that it is the high-pressure component of the high-intensity noninvasive ventilation approach that plays the important therapeutic role in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD patients.
机译:背景:最近,高强度(高压和高备用率)无创通气已被推荐用于稳定高碳酸血症性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗。然而,尚未研究高吸气压力和高备用率对呼吸机依从性和生理结果的相对影响。将患者随机分配至高压,高后备率(高强度)和高压,低后备率(高压),为期6周。在第一个治疗期结束时,患者被转为替代治疗。主要结局指标为平均每晚使用呼吸机。结果:招募了12名患者,其中7名完成了为期12周的试验方案。患者平均年龄为71±8岁,一秒钟的强制呼气量(FEV1)/强制肺活量(FVC)为50%±13%,FEV1为32%±12%。基线PaCO2和PaO2分别为8.6±1.7 kPa和7.3±1.4 kPa。高强度组和高压组之间的平均夜间呼吸机使用率没有显着差异(差异为4分钟; 95%置信区间为45至53; P = 0.9)。此外,除严重呼吸功能不全问卷的呼吸域外,其他任何次要终点均无差异,高强度组的呼吸域低于高压组(57±11 vs 69± 16; P <0.05)。结论:在夜间呼吸机依从性或任何其他测量参数方面,没有任何其他好处,这是通过在高压无创通气中增加高备用率来证明的。这些数据表明,高强度无创通气方法的高压成分在控制COPD患者高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭中起着重要的治疗作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号