首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Self efficacy measurement and goal attainment after pulmonary rehabilitation
【24h】

Self efficacy measurement and goal attainment after pulmonary rehabilitation

机译:肺康复后的自我效能测量和目标达成

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Little is known about self-efficacy in COPD and its role as a mediator of goal attainment after rehabilitation. We hypothesized that higher baseline self efficacy may facilitate goal attainment.Methods: 48 COPD patients completed pulmonary rehabilitation, self-efficacy was measured using the COPD Self Efficacy Scale (CSES). Personal goals were used as self reported outcome. Relationships were evaluated between CSES and St George’s Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ); depression; using Brief Assessment Schedule Cards (BASDEC), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL) and exercise tolerance; using Six-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) and muscle strength.Results: 74 Stable COPD patients, mean FEV1 1.2 (0.6) l, age 68.1 (10.2) years were recruited. 51 patients completed rehabilitation and 48 of those CSES and reported goal attainment. 94 goals were documented. Baseline self efficacy did not differ according to whether goal was achieved or not. Relationships were evident between CSES and SGRQ (r = –0.53), 6MWD (r = 0.36), BASDEC (r = –0.31), LCADL (r = –0.33) (all p ≤ 0.01), but not FEV1, pack years or muscle strength. There was a significant improvement in CSES scores pre to post rehabilitation, mean difference (95% CI) 0. 27 (0.04 to 0.51).Conclusions: Self efficacy, using the CSES, improves with rehabilitation but baseline self efficacy does not appear to influence goal attainment.
机译:背景:关于COPD的自我效能及其在康复后作为达成目标的中介者的作用知之甚少。我们假设较高的基线自我效能感可能有助于达到目标。方法:48位COPD患者完成了肺部康复,使用COPD自我效能感量表(CSES)来测量自我效能感。个人目标被用作自我报告的结果。评估了CSES与圣乔治医院呼吸调查问卷(SGRQ)之间的关系;萧条;使用简要评估时间表卡(BASDEC),伦敦胸部日常活动量表(LCADL)和运动耐力;结果:74名稳定的COPD患者,平均FEV1 1.2(0.6)l,年龄68.1(10.2)岁。 51例患者完成了康复,其中48例完成了CSES并达到了目标。记录了94个目标。基线自我效能根据目标是否实现而没有差异。 CSES和SGRQ(r = –0.53),6MWD(r = 0.36),BASDEC(r = –0.31),LCADL(r = –0.33)(所有p≤0.01)之间的关系很明显,但FEV1,包装年限或肌肉力量。康复前后CSES评分有显着改善,平均差异(95%CI)为0。27(0.04至0.51)。结论:使用CSES的自我效能随着康复而改善,但基线自我效能似乎不受影响目标达成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号