首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >The Effect of Metronome Use on Heart Rates and RPE for Drum Corps Percussionists
【24h】

The Effect of Metronome Use on Heart Rates and RPE for Drum Corps Percussionists

机译:节拍器的使用对鼓乐团打击乐手的心率和RPE的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose was to evaluate if playing a musical selection without a metronome would affect the heart rates and rate of perceived exertion for drum corps percussionists. Heart rate and RPE values were collected from 11 battery and 12 front ensemble members from one drum corps. The music consisted of two portions of the show at different tempos of 96 and 176 beats per minute. The music was performed at "standstill" with the battery members lined up behind the front ensemble marching, but not moving around or carrying their instruments. The participants performed each show tempo, with and without a metronome—three times with a one-minute rest period between each rep. Participants recorded RPE values for the two show tempos, with and without a metronome. There was no significant difference in heart rate when playing without a metronome at both tempos. RPE values were higher for the slower (11.83 ± 1.61 vs. 12.65 ± 1.72, p<0.05), and the faster selections (13.87 ± 2.34 vs. 14.48 ± 2.33, p<0.05) when playing without a metronome. The front ensemble heart rates were higher than the battery during the faster selection with (104.39 ± 6.93 vs. 129.19 ± 17.40 bpm, p<0.05) and without a metronome (105.03 ± 8.03 vs. 128.58 ± 18.84 bpm, p<0.05). Playing without a metronome requires more effort, psychologically, but does not affect heart rate. The physical demands of the faster selection are most likely the cause of the significant difference in heart rate between the battery and front ensemble.
机译:目的是评估在没有节拍器的情况下演奏音乐选集是否会影响心律和鼓乐团打击乐手的感知劳累率。从一个鼓队的11个电池组和12个前合奏成员中收集心率和RPE值。音乐由节目的两部分组成,每分钟的节奏分别为96和176拍。音乐是在“静止”状态下进行的,电池组在前合奏行进后排成一行,但不能四处走动或携带乐器。参加者在有和没有节拍器的情况下表演了每种表演节奏,每次表演之间有1分钟的休息时间,共3次。参与者记录了两个显示节奏的RPE值,带有和不带有节拍器。两种节奏都没有节拍器演奏时,心​​率没有显着差异。在没有节拍器演奏的情况下,RPE值越高,则选择越慢(11.83±1.61对12.65±1.72,p <0.05),选择越快(13.87±2.34对14.48±2.33,p <0.05)。在更快的选择速度下,前合奏心率高于电池组(104.39±6.93 vs. 129.19±17.40 bpm,p <0.05)和没有节拍器的情况下(105.03±8.03 vs.128.58±18.84 bpm,p <0.05)。在没有节拍器的情况下进行演奏需要更多的心理努力,但不会影响心律。快速选择的身体需求很可能是电池与前合奏之间心率显着不同的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号