首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Foot-to-Foot Bioelectrical Impedance, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Resistance-Trained Men and Women
【24h】

Foot-to-Foot Bioelectrical Impedance, Air Displacement Plethysmography, and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Resistance-Trained Men and Women

机译:电阻训练过的男性和女性的脚到脚生物电阻抗,空气置换体积描记法和双能X线吸收法

获取原文
           

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 11(4): 1145-1155, 2018. Accurate assessment of body composition is important to athletic performance goal setting and nutritional program design. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the “gold standard” in body composition assessment, yet the cost renders DXA unfeasible for many. Therefore, it is of interest to compare other body composition assessment methods to DXA in resistance-trained individuals whose focus is athletic performance. The purpose of the current study was to determine the agreement in estimates of body composition ((body fat (BF%); fat mass (FM); fat free mass (FFM)) by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; Tanita SC-331S) and air displacement plethysmography (ADP; BODPOD) compared to DXA (Hologic Horizon A) in 31 resistance-trained adults (men=15, women=16; mean±SD: 23.6±4.7years). Differences were found in BF% and FM between BIA and DXA. Regression analysis showed BF% and BMI to explain 24% and 29.9% of the variance in BF% measurements between DXA and BIA, respectively. The results of the Bland-Altman plot indicate a poor level of agreement between BIA and DXA for BF%, FM, and FFM (-4.56±8.82 %, -3.48±7.04 kg, 4.59±7.33 kg, respectively). ADP had wide limits of agreement for all variables (BF: 1.85±4.83 %, FM: 1.54±3.72 kg, FFM:-0.22±4.15 kg). BIA and ADP showed increasing variance in all measures as levels of fatness increased, with the exception of FFM for ADP. Compared to DXA, BIA overestimated BF% and FM, and underestimated FFM. Although wide individual errors were noted, no differences were found between ADP and DXA. The magnitude of inaccuracies between methods may be dependent upon individual body fatness.
机译:国际运动科学杂志11(4):1145-1155,2018.身体成分的准确评估对运动成绩目标设定和营养计划设计很重要。双能X射线吸收法(DXA)被认为是人体成分评估中的“金标准”,但是成本使得DXA在许多人中不可行。因此,有兴趣将其他身体成分评估方法与DXA进行比较,重点是运动表现的接受抵抗训练的个体。本研究的目的是通过生物电阻抗分析(BIA; Tanita SC-331S)确定人体成分估算值((人体脂肪(BF%);脂肪质量(FM);无脂肪质量(FFM))的一致性。在31例接受阻力训练的成年人(男性= 15,女性= 16;平均±SD:23.6±4.7年)中,与DXA(《 Hologic Horizo​​ n A》)相比,空气体积描记法(ADP; BODPOD)进行了比较。回归分析表明,BF%和BMI分别解释了DXA和BIA之间BF%测量值的24%和29.9%。 BF%,FM和FFM的DXA(分别为-4.56±8.82%,-3.48±7.04 kg,4.59±7.33 kg)。ADP对于所有变量的一致性都较宽(BF:1.85±4.83%,FM:1.54 ±3.72 kg,FFM:-0.22±4.15 kg)。BIA和ADP在所有措施中均显示出随着脂肪水平的增加而增加的差异(ADP的FFM除外)。与DXA相比,BIA高估了BF%和FM,而低估了FFM。尽管注意到了很大的个人错误,但在ADP和DXA之间没有发现差异。方法之间不准确的程度可能取决于个人的身体脂肪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号