首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women
【24h】

Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women

机译:双能X线骨密度仪,空气体积体积描记法和生物电阻抗分析在评估肥胖病女性肥胖者身体成分方面的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Objectives: We evaluated the agreement of air displacement plethysmography (ADP) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of percent fat mass (%FM) in morbidly obese women. Subjects/Methods: Fifty-seven women aged 19-55 years and with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 37.3 to 55.2 kg/m 2 were studied. Values of %FM were obtained directly from ADP and DXA, whereas for BIA we estimated fat-free mass (FFM) from an equation for morbidly obese subjects and calculated %FM as (weight-FFM)/weight. Results: The mean (s.d.) difference between ADP and DXA for the assessment of %FM was -2.4% (3.3%) with limits of agreement (LOA) from -8.8% to 4.1%. The mean (s.d.) difference between BIA and DXA for the assessment of %FM was 1.7% (3.3%) with LOA from -4.9% to 8.2%. Conclusion: ADP-DXA and BIA-DXA are not interchangeable methods for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women.
机译:背景/目的:我们评估了空气体积体积描记法(ADP)和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)与双能X射线吸收测定(DXA)的一致性,以评估病态肥胖女性的脂肪百分比(%FM)。对象/方法:研究了57名19-55岁且体重指数(BMI)为37.3至55.2 kg / m 2的女性。 %FM的值直接从ADP和DXA获得,而对于BIA,我们根据病态肥胖受试者的方程估算无脂肪质量(FFM),并将%FM计算为(体重-FFM)/体重。结果:ADP和DXA评估%FM的平均(s.d.)差异为-2.4%(3.3%),协议限制(LOA)从-8.8%到4.1%。 BIA和DXA评估%FM的平均(s.d.)差异为1.7%(3.3%),LOA从-4.9%到8.2%。结论:ADP-DXA和BIA-DXA不能用于评估病态肥胖妇女的身体成分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号