...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Health Geographics >Do measures matter? Comparing surface-density-derived and census-tract-derived measures of racial residential segregation
【24h】

Do measures matter? Comparing surface-density-derived and census-tract-derived measures of racial residential segregation

机译:措施重要吗?比较基于表面密度和人口普查的种族居民隔离措施

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Racial residential segregation is hypothesized to affect population health by systematically patterning health-relevant exposures and opportunities according to individuals' race or income. Growing interest into the association between residential segregation and health disparities demands more rigorous appraisal of commonly used measures of segregation. Most current studies rely on census tracts as approximations of the local residential environment when calculating segregation indices of either neighborhoods or metropolitan areas. Because census tracts are arbitrary in size and shape, reliance on this geographic scale limits understanding of place-health associations. More flexible, explicitly spatial derivations of traditional segregation indices have been proposed but have not been compared with tract-derived measures in the context of health disparities studies common to social epidemiology, health demography, or medical geography. We compared segregation measured with tract-derived as well as GIS surface-density-derived indices. Measures were compared by region and population size, and segregation measures were linked to birth record to estimate the difference in association between segregation and very preterm birth. Separate analyses focus on metropolitan segregation and on neighborhood segregation. Results Across 231 metropolitan areas, tract-derived and surface-density-derived segregation measures are highly correlated. However overall correlation obscures important differences by region and metropolitan size. In general the discrepancy between measure types is greatest for small metropolitan areas, declining with increasing population size. Discrepancies in measures are greatest in the South, and smallest in Western metropolitan areas. Choice of segregation index changed the magnitude of the measured association between segregation and very preterm birth. For example among black women, the risk ratio for very preterm birth in metropolitan areas changed from 2.12 to 1.68 for the effect of high versus low segregation when using surface-density-derived versus tract-derived segregation indices. Variation in effect size was smaller but still present in analyses of neighborhood racial composition and very preterm birth in Atlanta neighborhoods. Conclusion Census tract-derived measures of segregation are highly correlated with recently introduced spatial segregation measures, but the residual differences among measures are not uniform for all areas. Use of surface-density-derived measures provides researchers with tools to further explore the spatial relationships between segregation and health disparities.
机译:背景假设种族居民隔离会通过根据个人的种族或收入系统地设计与健康相关的风险和机会,从而影响人口健康。对居住区隔离与健康差异之间联系的兴趣日益浓厚,要求对常用的隔离措施进行更严格的评估。当前的大多数研究在计算邻里或大都市地区的隔离指数时,都以人口普查区域为当地居住环境的近似值。由于人口普查区域的大小和形状是任意的,因此对这种地理尺度的依赖限制了对地方健康关联的理解。已经提出了对传统隔离指数的更灵活,明确的空间推导,但是在社会流行病学,卫生人口统计学或医学地理学普遍存在的卫生差距研究的背景下,尚未将其与基于道的测度进行比较。我们将测量的偏析与基于道的以及基于GIS表面密度的指数进行了比较。比较了按地区和人口规模衡量的指标,并将隔离措施与出生记录相关联,以估计隔离与早产之间的关联差异。单独的分析集中于大都市隔离和邻里隔离。结果在231个大都市区中,基于道的隔离措施和基于表面密度的隔离措施高度相关。但是,总体相关性掩盖了按地区和大城市规模划分的重要差异。一般而言,小城市地区的度量类型之间的差异最大,随着人口规模的增加而减小。南部地区的措施差异最大,西部地区的差异最小。隔离指数的选择改变了隔离度与早产之间的相关性。例如,在黑人妇女中,当使用表面密度和路段隔离指数时,高隔离对低隔离的影响,大都市地区早产的风险比从2.12变为1.68。影响大小的变化较小,但在亚特兰大社区的邻里种族构成和非常早产的分析中仍然存在。结论人口普查得出的隔离措施与最近引入的空间隔离措施高度相关,但措施之间的剩余差异在所有地区并非统一。使用表面密度测量法为研究人员提供了进一步探索隔离与健康差异之间空间关系的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号