首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled umeclidinium/vilanterol in Asian patients with COPD: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled umeclidinium/vilanterol in Asian patients with COPD: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled study

机译:每天一次吸入乌米地丁/维兰特罗对亚洲COPD患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机,安慰剂对照研究的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Combination of the inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC; GSK573719) with the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) is an approved maintenance treatment for COPD in the US and EU. We compared the efficacy and safety of UMEC/VI with placebo in patients with COPD of Asian ancestry.Patients and methods: In this 24-week, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to UMEC/VI 125/25?μg, UMEC/VI 62.5/25?μg, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on day 169; secondary end points were Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24 and weighted mean (WM) FEV1 over 0–6 hours postdose on day 1. Additional end points and safety were also assessed.Results: Both UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mg statistically significantly improved trough FEV1 at day 169 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25?μg, 0.216 L, [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.175–0.257]; UMEC/VI 62.5/25?μg, 0.151 L, 95% CI 0.110–0.191; both P<0.001). Statistically significant improvements in TDI score were observed for both UMEC/VI groups versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25?μg, 0.9, 95% CI 0.3–1.4, P=0.002; UMEC/VI 62.5/25?μg, 0.7, 95% CI 0.1–1.2, P=0.016). On day 1, both UMEC/VI groups improved 0–6-hour WM FEV1 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25?μg, 0.182 L 95% CI 0.161–0.203; UMEC/VI 62.5/25?μg, 0.160?L, 95% CI 0.139–0.181; both P<0.001). Statistically significant improvements for UMEC/VI groups versus placebo were observed for rescue albuterol use at?weeks 1–24 (puffs/day, both P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups.Conclusion: In Asian patients with COPD, once-daily UMEC/VI 125/25?μg and UMEC 62.5/25?μg resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in lung-function end points versus placebo. Symptomatic and quality of life measures also improved. The safety profile of UMEC/VI was consistent with previous studies.
机译:背景:吸入性长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂umeclidinium(UMEC; GSK573719)与长效β2-激动剂维兰特罗(VI)的组合是美国和欧盟批准的COPD维持治疗方法。我们比较了UMEC / VI和安慰剂对亚洲人COPD患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:在这项为期24周的III期,多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究中,将患者按1:1 1:1的比例随机分为UMEC / VI 125/25?g,UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25?g或安慰剂。主要疗效终点是第169天在1秒内通过低谷呼气量(FEV1);次要终点为第1天服药后0-6小时的第24周的过渡性呼吸困难指数(TDI)焦点评分和加权平均(WM)FEV1。还评估了其他终点和安全性。结果:UMEC / VI 125/25 μg和UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25 mg在第169天时的谷值FEV1与安慰剂相比有统计学显着改善(UMEC / VI 125 /25μg,0.216 L,[95%置信区间[CI] 0.175-0.257]; UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25微克,0.151升,95%CI 0.110-0.191;均P <0.001)。两组UMEC / VI组和安慰剂组的TDI得分均有统计学上的显着提高(UMEC / VI 125/25?g,0.9,95%CI 0.3–1.4,P = 0.002; UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25?μg,0.7, 95%CI 0.1–1.2,P = 0.016)。在第1天,两个UMEC / VI组与安慰剂组相比改善了0-6小时WM FEV1(UMEC / VI 125/25?g,0.182 L 95%CI 0.161-0.203; UMEC / VI 62.5 / 25?g,0.160?L ,95%CI 0.139–0.181;均P <0.001)。 UMEC / VI组与安慰剂相比,在1至24周的使用沙丁胺醇方面有统计学上的显着改善(粉扑/天,两者均P <0.001)。结论:在亚洲慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,每天一次的UMEC / VI 125 /25μg和UMEC 62.5 /25μg可使肺功能终点在临床上有意义且具有统计学意义的改善与安慰剂。对症和生活质量措施也得到了改善。 UMEC / VI的安全性与以前的研究一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号