...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >The Validity Of 7-Site Skinfold Measurements Taken By Exercise Science Students
【24h】

The Validity Of 7-Site Skinfold Measurements Taken By Exercise Science Students

机译:运动科学专业学生进行7站点皮褶测量的有效性

获取原文

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 6(1) : 20-28, 2013. Skinfold (SKF) measurement is arguably the most ubiquitous method of estimating percent body fat (%BF) because of cost, ease, and feasibility. However, it is unknown how accurately novice exercise science students measure SKF thickness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity with which exercise science students in an Exercise Physiology course measured skinfold thickness and estimated percent body fat (%BF) when compared to a skilled technician. Twenty-three novice undergraduate students were afforded both verbal measurement instruction and visual measurement demonstration and, subsequently, assessed SKF thicknesses of a male and female testee. %BF was calculated using measurements obtained by the skilled technician and students. Comparisons were made between measurements taken by the skilled technician and students using error, absolute error, and one sample t-tests. For the female testee, average error ranged from -0.5 mm to -4.8 mm for the 7-sites, 1.7±15.4 mm for the sum of 7-sites, and -3.7±2.6% for %BF. The average absolute error ranged from 1.2 mm to 4.9 mm for the 7-sites, 23.3±12.7 mm for the sum of 7-sites, and 3.9±2.2% for %BF. For the male testee, average error ranged from 0.0 mm to 0.9 mm for the 7-sites, 2.9±8.5 mm for the sum of 7-sites, and 0.5±1.4% for %BF. The average absolute error ranged from 0.6 mm to 1.1 mm for the 7-sites, 4.8±7.5 mm for the sum of 7-sites, and 0.8±1.2% for BF%. The one sample t-tests revealed no significant differences in the sum of 7-sites and %BF for the male model (p>0.05), but significant differences were found for the female model (p<0.05). From a practical perspective, when novice exercise science students were provided both verbal and visual instructions of SKF measurement technique, students were able to accurately assess %BF of a male testee as compared to the skilled technician. With respect to the female testee, however, students underestimated the sum of the 7 SKF sites by ~ 20 mm when compared to the skilled technician. Additional tutelage and practice may be necessary when teaching SKF measurement of females and/or individuals with higher %BF to novice undergraduate exercise science students.
机译:国际运动科学杂志6(1):20-28,2013。由于成本,易用性和可行性,皮褶(SKF)测量可以说是估算人体脂肪百分比(%BF)的最普遍的方法。但是,尚不清楚新手运动科学学生如何准确地测量SKF厚度。因此,本研究的目的是确定与熟练的技术人员相比,运动生理学课程的运动科学专业学生测量皮褶厚度和估计体脂百分比(%BF)的有效性。向23名新手本科生提供了口头测量指导和视觉测量演示,随后评估了男性和女性睾丸的SKF厚度。使用熟练的技术人员和学生获得的测量值来计算%BF。在熟练技术人员和学生使用误差,绝对误差和一个样本t检验进行的测量之间进行比较。对于女性睾丸,7个部位的平均误差为-0.5 mm至-4.8 mm,7个部位的总误差为1.7±15.4 mm,%BF的平均误差为-3.7±2.6%。 7个位置的平均绝对误差范围为1.2 mm至4.9 mm,7个位置的总和的平均绝对误差范围为23.3±12.7 mm,%BF的平均绝对误差范围为3.9±2.2%。对于男性睾丸,7个部位的平均误差范围为0.0 mm至0.9 mm,7个部位的总和的平均误差范围为2.9±8.5 mm,%BF的平均误差范围为0.5±1.4%。 7个位置的平均绝对误差范围为0.6 mm至1.1 mm,7个位置的总和的平均绝对误差范围为4.8±7.5 mm,BF%的平均绝对误差范围为0.8±1.2%。一项样本t检验显示,男性模型的7个位点和%BF的总和无显着差异(p> 0.05),而女性模型则具有显着差异(p <0.05)。从实践的角度来看,当向运动科学新手提供SKF测量技术的口头和视觉指导时,与熟练的技术人员相比,学生能够准确评估男性睾丸的%BF。但是,相对于熟练的技术人员,对于女性受测者,学生低估了7个SKF部位的总和〜20 mm。向新手本科运动科学学生教授女性和/或%BF较高的个人的SKF测量时,可能需要额外的指导和练习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号