...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Forearm EMG During Rock Climbing Differs from EMG During Handgrip Dynamometry
【24h】

Forearm EMG During Rock Climbing Differs from EMG During Handgrip Dynamometry

机译:攀岩过程中的前臂肌电图与握力法中的肌电图不同

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Grip force, as measured via handgrip dynamometry, is often given importance in the study of rock climbing performance. Whether handgrip dynamometry produces a degree of muscle activation comparable to actual climbing has not been reported. Furthermore, the degree and variability of muscle activation for various configurations during climbing are unknown. The purpose of this study was to record forearm EMG responses for six hand configurations during climbing and to compare these responses to a maximum handgrip test. Five experienced climbers signed informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects performed four moves up (UP) and down (DN) on an overhanging 45-deg. climbing wall with each of six hand configurations: crimp (C), pinch (P), three 2-finger combinations (2F1, 2F2, 2F3) and an open-hand grip (O). Forearm EMG was recorded via surface electrodes. Data were recorded for the second UP and second DN moves. Prior to climbing, maximum handgrip force (HG) and simultaneous EMG were obtained. Mean HG force was 526.6±33.3 N. Times to complete the climbing movements with each hand configuration varied between 3.1±0.5 and 4.8±0.9 sec, however no significant differences were found. All peak EMG’s during climbing were higher than HG EMG (p<.05). Mean EMG amplitudes for UP, expressed as percentages of HG EMG, were 198±55, 169±22, 222±72, 181±39, 126±32, and 143±47% for C, P, 2F1, 2F2, 2F3, and O respectively. Significant differences were found for O versus 2F1 and for 2F3 versus 2F1 and C (p<.05). All EMG amplitudes were lower for DN than UP (p<.05). Since all climbing EMGs exceeded HG EMG, it was concluded that handgrip dynamometry lacks specificity to actual rock climbing.
机译:通过握力测功法测量的握力在攀岩性能研究中通常很重要。尚未进行过握力测功是否产生与实际攀登相当的肌肉活化程度的报道。此外,在攀爬过程中各种构造的肌肉激活的程度和变异性尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是记录攀爬过程中六种手型的前臂肌电图反应,并将这些反应与最大手握力测试进行比较。五名经验丰富的登山者签署了知情同意书以参加研究。受试者在悬垂的45度上进行了四次向上(UP)和向下(DN)移动。攀岩墙,具有六种手部构造:压接(C),捏紧(P),三个2指组合(2F1、2F2、2F3)和张开的把手(O)。经由表面电极记录前臂EMG。记录第二次UP和第二次DN移动的数据。在攀登之前,要获得最大的握力(HG)和同时的EMG。平均HG力为526.6±33.3N。每只手的形态完成攀爬运动的时间在3.1±0.5至4.8±0.9秒之间变化,但未发现明显差异。攀爬过程中所有的峰值肌电图均高于HG肌电图(p <.05)。 UP的平均EMG振幅表示为HG EMG的百分比,对于C,P,2F1、2F2、2F3,为198±55、169±22、222±72、181±39、126±32和143±47%,和O分别。发现O与2F1以及2F3与2F1和C有显着差异(p <.05)。 DN的所有EMG振幅均低于UP(p <.05)。由于所有的攀岩肌电图都超过了HG肌电图,因此得出的结论是,握力测功对实际攀岩缺乏特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号