...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of agricultural research >Resource Use Efficiency among Beneficiaries and Non-beneficiaries of Fadama Rice Project in Niger State, Nigeria
【24h】

Resource Use Efficiency among Beneficiaries and Non-beneficiaries of Fadama Rice Project in Niger State, Nigeria

机译:尼日利亚尼日尔州Fadama Rice项目受益人和非受益人之间的资源利用效率

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study compared the resource use efficiency among beneficiary and non-beneficiary rice farmers of Fadama Project in Niger State, Nigeria. Data used for the study was obtained using structured questionnaire administered on 120 randomly selected rice farmers from both the beneficiary (60) and non-beneficiary (60) groups of Fadama Rice Project in the state. Technical and allocative efficiency estimates were obtained using stochastic frontier production function and marginal product approach, respectively.The study found that the technical efficiency of the Fadama group ranged between 0.41 and 1.00 with a mean value of 0.79 while that of the non-Fadama group ranged between 0.44 and on 0.98 with a mean value of 0.81 on the scale of one. The result of t-test showed that the difference between the mean scores of the two groups was not statistically significant. Allocative efficiency analysis also showed that the two groups under-utilized available resource inputs. Elite capture of the Fadama project as well as equal access to inputs except for Fadama Advisory Service and input supports may have explained the lack of significant difference in the mean scores of the two groups on technical and allocative efficiencies. The study recommends that the project implementation strategy should tackle the challenge of elite capture, inputs diversion, intensify advisory services/training and ensure the usage of high yielding seeds, labour saving technology and agro-chemicals for rice farmers.
机译:该研究比较了尼日利亚尼日尔州Fadama项目的受益稻农和非受益稻农的资源利用效率。该研究使用的数据是通过使用结构性问卷调查而获得的,该问卷是对来自该州Fadama水稻项目的受益人(60)和非受益人(60)的120个随机选择的稻农进行管理的。通过随机前沿生产函数和边际产品方法分别获得了技术效率和分配效率的估计,研究发现Fadama组的技术效率在0.41到1.00之间,平均值为0.79,而非Fadama组的技术效率在0.79到1。在0.44和0.98之间,平均值为0.81(以1为单位)。 t检验的结果表明,两组平均得分之间的差异无统计学意义。分配效率分析还表明,这两个群体未充分利用可用资源。除了Fadama咨询服务和投入支持外,对Fadama项目的精益求精以及对投入的平等利用,可能解释了两组在技术和分配效率方面的平均得分之间没有显着差异。研究建议,项目实施战略应应对精英捕获,投入转移,加强咨询服务/培训的挑战,并确保水稻种植者使用高产种子,省力技术和农药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号