首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Air Quality Strategies on Public Health and Health Equity in Europe—A Systematic Review
【24h】

Air Quality Strategies on Public Health and Health Equity in Europe—A Systematic Review

机译:欧洲公共卫生和卫生公平的空气质量策略-系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Air pollution is an important public health problem in Europe and there is evidence that it exacerbates health inequities. This calls for effective strategies and targeted interventions. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies relating to air pollution control on public health and health equity in Europe. Three databases, Web of Science, PubMed, and Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions (TRoPHI), were searched for scientific publications investigating the effectiveness of strategies on outdoor air pollution control, public health and health equity in Europe from 1995 to 2015. A total of 15 scientific papers were included in the review after screening 1626 articles. Four groups of strategy types, namely, general regulations on air quality control, road traffic related emission control interventions, energy generation related emission control interventions and greenhouse gas emission control interventions for climate change mitigation were identified. All of the strategies reviewed reported some improvement in air quality and subsequently in public health. The reduction of the air pollutant concentrations and the reported subsequent health benefits were more significant within the geographic areas affected by traffic related interventions. Among the various traffic related interventions, low emission zones appeared to be more effective in reducing ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter levels. Only few studies considered implications for health equity, three out of 15, and no consistent results were found indicating that these strategies could reduce health inequity associated with air pollution. Particulate matter (particularly fine particulate matter) and NO2 were the dominant outdoor air pollutants examined in the studies in Europe in recent years. Health benefits were gained either as a direct, intended objective or as a co-benefit from all of the strategies examined, but no consistent impact on health equity from the strategies was found. The strategy types aiming to control air pollution in Europe and the health impact assessment methodology were also discussed in this review.
机译:空气污染是欧洲重要的公共卫生问题,有证据表明,空气污染加剧了健康不平等现象。这要求采取有效的策略和有针对性的干预措施。在这项研究中,我们进行了系统的评估,以评估与空气污染控制有关的策略对欧洲公共卫生和健康公平的有效性。搜索了三个数据库,即Web of Science,PubMed和促进健康干预试验注册(TRoPHI),以研究科学出版物,研究1995年至2015年欧洲室外空气污染控制,公共卫生和健康公平战略的有效性。筛选1626篇文章后,将15篇科学论文中的1篇纳入综述。确定了四类策略类型,分别是空气质量控制的一般规定,与道路交通有关的排放控制干预措施,与能源产生有关的排放控制干预措施和缓解气候变化的温室气体排放控制干预措施。所审查的所有策略都报告了空气质量以及随后的公共卫生有所改善。在受交通相关干预影响的地理区域内,空气污染物浓度的降低和所报告的后续健康益处更为显着。在各种与交通有关的干预措施中,低排放区似乎在降低环境二氧化氮(NO2)和颗粒物含量方面更为有效。只有极少数的研究考虑了对健康公平的影响,每15个研究中就有3个,没有发现一致的结果表明这些策略可以减少与空气污染相关的健康不平等。近年来,在欧洲的研究中,颗粒物(尤其是细颗粒物)和NO2是主要的室外空气污染物。从所审查的所有策略中,既可以直接获得预期的目标,也可以从中受益,从而获得健康益处,但是这些策略并未对健康公平产生持续的影响。本文还讨论了旨在控制欧洲空气污染的战略类型和健康影响评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号