...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Experimental Study on Ultrafine Particle Removal Performance of Portable Air Cleaners with Different Filters in an Office Room
【24h】

Experimental Study on Ultrafine Particle Removal Performance of Portable Air Cleaners with Different Filters in an Office Room

机译:便携式空气滤清器在办公室室内超细颗粒去除性能的实验研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Size- and time-dependent aerodynamic behaviors of indoor particles, including PM1.0, were evaluated in a school office in order to test the performance of air-cleaning devices using different filters. In-situ real-time measurements were taken using an optical particle counter. The filtration characteristics of filter media, including single-pass efficiency, volume and effectiveness, were evaluated and analyzed. The electret filter (EE) medium shows better initial removal efficiency than the high efficiency (HE) medium in the 0.3–3.5 μm particle size range, while under the same face velocity, the filtration resistance of the HE medium is several times higher than that of the EE medium. During service life testing, the efficiency of the EE medium decreased to 60% with a total purifying air flow of 25 × 104 m3/m2. The resistance curve rose slightly before the efficiency reached the bottom, and then increased almost exponentially. The single-pass efficiency of portable air cleaner (PAC) with the pre-filter (PR) or the active carbon granule filter (CF) was relatively poor. While PAC with the pre-filter and the high efficiency filter (PR&HE) showed maximum single-pass efficiency for PM1.0 (88.6%), PAC with the HE was the most effective at removing PM1.0. The enhancement of PR with HE and electret filters augmented the single-pass efficiency, but lessened the airflow rate and effectiveness. Combined with PR, the decay constant of large-sized particles could be greater than for PACs without PR. Without regard to the lifetime, the electret filters performed better with respect to resource saving and purification improvement. A most penetrating particle size range (MPPS: 0.4–0.65 μm) exists in both HE and electret filters; the MPPS tends to become larger after HE and electret filters are combined with PR. These results serve to provide a better understanding of the indoor particle removal performance of PACs when combined with different kinds of filters in school office buildings.
机译:在学校办公室评估了室内颗粒(包括PM1.0)随时间变化的空气动力学行为,以测试使用不同过滤器的空气净化装置的性能。使用光学粒子计数器进行原位实时测量。评估和分析了过滤介质的过滤特性,包括单次通过效率,体积和效率。在0.3-3.5μm的粒径范围内,驻极体过滤器(EE)介质显示出比高效(HE)介质更好的初始去除效率,而在相同的表面速度下,HE介质的过滤阻力比其高几倍。 EE介质。在使用寿命测试期间,EE介质的效率降至60%,总净化空气流量为25×104 m3 / m2。在效率达到最低点之前,电阻曲线略有上升,然后几乎呈指数增长。带有预过滤器(PR)或活性炭颗粒过滤器(CF)的便携式空气滤清器(PAC)的单次通过效率相对较差。带有预过滤器和高效过滤器(PR&HE)的PAC对PM1.0表现出最大的单通效率(88.6%),而带有HE的PAC对去除PM1.0最有效。 HE和驻极体过滤器增强了PR,从而提高了单通效率,但降低了气流速率和效率。与PR结合使用时,大颗粒的衰减常数可能大于没有PR的PAC的衰减常数。不考虑使用寿命,驻极体过滤器在节省资源和提纯方面表现更好。 HE和驻极体过滤器均存在最穿透的粒径范围(MPPS:0.4–0.65μm); HE和驻极体滤波器与PR结合后,MPPS趋于变大。这些结果有助于更好地了解PAC在学校办公大楼中与各种类型的过滤器结合使用时的室内颗粒去除性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号