...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Comparison of a Pneumatic Compression Device to a Compression Garment During Recovery from DOMS
【24h】

Comparison of a Pneumatic Compression Device to a Compression Garment During Recovery from DOMS

机译:从DOMS回收期间将气动压缩设备与压缩服装进行比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 11(3): 375-383, 2018. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a pneumatic compression device (PCD) compared to a continuously-worn compression sleeve (CS) during a five-day recovery period from delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) of the elbow flexors. Eight college-aged students participated in this crossover design study. The muscle-damage protocol consisted of four sets of 25 repetitions of isokinetic concentric elbow flexion followed by eccentric elbow extension at 60 o/second. Immediately following the muscle-damage protocol, subjects either wore a CS continually for five days or completed daily, 20-minute PCD treatments for five days. Swelling, range of motion (ROM), and pain were measured daily during the five-day recovery period. Subjects rested for seven additional days before completing another muscle-damage protocol and the remaining treatment. Treatment order was randomized and balanced. Muscle swelling, assessed via changes in upper arm circumference, was significantly lower in the PCD treatment (1.7 vs. 2.0 cm in CS, p = 0.012), however there was no difference in lower arm circumference (p = 0.091). ROM disturbances during the PCD treatment were lower (mean peak reduction in ROM -9.04 degrees in PCD compared to -17.25 degrees in CS, p < 0.05) and peak pain was lower by 39% (27.5 mm in PCD compared to 45.2 mm in CS, p < 0.05) when compared to the CS treatment. These findings suggest that daily treatments using a PCD further reduce peak disturbance and recovery time from DOMS of the elbow flexors when compared to a continuously-worn CS.
机译:国际运动科学杂志11(3):375-383,2018.这项研究的目的是确定为期五天的气动压缩装置(PCD)与连续磨损的压缩套(CS)相比的效果肘屈肌迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)的恢复期。八名大学生参加了这项跨界设计研究。肌肉损伤方案包括四组,每组25次等速同心肘弯曲,然后以60 o / s的速度进行偏心肘伸展。紧接肌肉损伤方案后,受试者要么连续佩戴CS 5天,要么每天完成20天PCD治疗5天。在五天的恢复期内,每天测量肿胀,活动范围(ROM)和疼痛。在完成另一项肌肉损伤方案和其余治疗之前,受试者再休息七天。治疗顺序是随机且平衡的。通过上臂围的变化评估的肌肉肿胀在PCD治疗中显着降低(CS中为1.7 vs. 2.0 cm,p = 0.012),但下臂围没有差异(p = 0.091)。 PCD治疗期间的ROM干扰较低(PCD中ROM -9.04度的平均峰值降低,而CS中为-17.25度,p <0.05),峰值疼痛降低了39%(PCD中的27.5毫米,CS中为45.2毫米)。 ,p <0.05)与CS治疗相比。这些发现表明,与连续佩戴的CS相比,使用PCD进行的日常治疗可进一步减少峰值屈曲和肘屈肌DOMS的恢复时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号