首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Electrochemical Science >Failure Pressure Estimations for Pipes with Combined Corrosion Defects on the External Surface: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Failure Pressure Estimations for Pipes with Combined Corrosion Defects on the External Surface: A Comparative Study

机译:外表面有复合腐蚀缺陷的管道的失效压力估算:比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In this research paper, the failure pressure predictions were obtained for a pipeline section by analyzing a combined corrosion defects, which joins together a general corrosion and a pitting corrosion defects. Well-known conventional mathematical methods were used in this study to predict the failure pressure of corroded steel pipelines, such as: B31G, RSTRENG-1, Shell-92, DNV, PCORR, and Fitnet FFS. The equations reported for corrosion defects with more complex characteristics developed by Choi et al., and Cronin et al. were also used. Furthermore, Finite Element (FEM) is one of the most employed nonlinear methods because of its good response of pipeline failure prediction under the corrosion mechanism. So, FEM methodology results the least conservative in comparison with the others mathematical models, according to the literature, for this reason it was used to compare the standard deviation ? of the methods. Failure pressure predictions determined that the most conservative methods were: Shell-92, Fitnet FFS, Choi’s method, B31G, RSTRENG-1, Cronin′s method, PCORR and DNV, in that order.
机译:在这篇研究论文中,通过分析组合的腐蚀缺陷获得了管道断面的失效压力预测,这些腐蚀缺陷将普通腐蚀和点蚀缺陷结合在一起。本研究中使用了众所周知的常规数学方法来预测腐蚀的钢管的破坏压力,例如:B31G,RSTRENG-1,Shell-92,DNV,PCORR和Fitnet FFS。 Choi等人和Cronin等人开发了有关具有更复杂特征的腐蚀缺陷的等式。也被使用。此外,有限元(FEM)是最常用的非线性方法之一,因为它在腐蚀机理下对管道故障的预测具有良好的响应性。因此,根据文献资料,与其他数学模型相比,有限元方法的保守性最低,因此被用于比较标准偏差?的方法。失效压力预测确定最保守的方法依次为:Shell-92,Fitnet FFS,Choi方法,B31G,RSTRENG-1,Cronin方法,PCORR和DNV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号