...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of communications, network, and system sciences >A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures
【24h】

A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures

机译:不同光交换架构的比较和性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth. Several different technologies have been developed for optical packet switching such as space switches, broadcast-and-select, input buffered switches and output buffered switches. These architectures vary based on several parameters such as the way of optical buffering, the placement of optical buffers, the way of solving the external blocking inherited from switching technologies in general and the components used to implement the WDM. This study surveys most of the exiting optical packet switching architectures. A simulation-based comparison of input buffered and output buffered architectures is presented. The performance analysis of the selected two architectures is derived using simulation program and compared at different scenarios. We found that the output buffered architectures give better performance than input buffered architectures. The simulation results show that the-broadcast-and-select architecture is attractive in terms that it has lees number of components compared to other switches.
机译:在过去的十年中,基于波分复用(WDM)的光分组交换(OPS)和传输网络已越来越多地部署在Internet基础结构中,以满足日益增长的带宽需求。已经开发了用于光分组交换的几种不同技术,例如空间交换机,广播和选择,输入缓冲交换机和输出缓冲交换机。这些体系结构基于几个参数而有所不同,例如光缓冲的方式,光缓冲的位置,解决从交换技术继承来的外部阻塞的方式以及通常用于实现WDM的组件。这项研究调查了大多数现有的光分组交换体系结构。提出了基于仿真的输入缓冲和输出缓冲体系结构比较。使用仿真程序导出所选两种体系结构的性能分析,并在不同情况下进行比较。我们发现,输出缓冲架构比输入缓冲架构具有更好的性能。仿真结果表明,与其他交换机相比,广播选择架构具有诱人的吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号